1979
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(79)90241-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The regression of synapses formed by a foreign nerve in a mature axolotl striated muscle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
14
2

Year Published

1980
1980
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
14
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Dennis, personal communication) and their estimations of the quantal content of e.p.p.s evoked by stimulation of the foreign nerve were very similar to ours. In contrast to these findings however, Bennett et al (1979) were unable to find any difference between the quantal contents of e.p.p.s evoked by stimulation of a transplanted foreign nerve and the original nerve in the forelimb of the axolotl. However, an important difference in their study was that they suppressed neuromuscular transmission with low [Ca].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Dennis, personal communication) and their estimations of the quantal content of e.p.p.s evoked by stimulation of the foreign nerve were very similar to ours. In contrast to these findings however, Bennett et al (1979) were unable to find any difference between the quantal contents of e.p.p.s evoked by stimulation of a transplanted foreign nerve and the original nerve in the forelimb of the axolotl. However, an important difference in their study was that they suppressed neuromuscular transmission with low [Ca].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…high [Mg]0 Ringer solution in order to obtain m.e.p.p.s and sub-threshold e.p.p.s on which a binomial analysis was performed. One possible explanation for why we observed differences between the quantal content of e.p.p.s whereas Bennett et al (1979) In the present study the reason for the abnormally low quantal content of e.p.p.s evoked in biceps during stimulation of the implanted nerve was not established. One possible explanation was that the foreign synapses could have been formed ectopically and therefore taken longer to mature than those formed by the original nerve if it had reinnervated its old synaptic gutters.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is not clear, however, whether axonal diameter is an intrinsic neuronal feature determining the number of terminal branches and motor unit size, or rather a response to some peripheral advantage over other axons and consequently more trophic feed-back from muscles of a substance analogous to nerve growth factor (Brown, Jansen & Van Essen, 1976;Hollyday & Hamburger, 1976;Betz, Caldwell & Ribchester, 1980;Oppenheim, 1981 (Grinnell, Letinsky & Rheuben, 1979 Nudell & Grinnell, 1983). Many other instances of competitive interaction between terminals on multiply innervated amphibian fibres have been reported (Dennis & Yip, 1978;Wigston, 1980;Bennett, McGrath & Davey, 1979; see reviews by Mark, 1980; In contrast to the sartorius, the fibres of the cutaneous pectoris muscle each have only one end-plate site. Consistent with the concept of competitive regulation of synaptic strength, the cutaneous pectoris junctions are of higher efficacy than those of the sartorius (see Introduction) and the occurrence of very small motor units with large tetanus/twitch ratios is rare (L. 0.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suppression suggests that the formation of synapses by motor axons is favoured in some parts of a muscle over others, depending on the position of the motoneurones in the spinal cord. There is evidence that transmission from foreign nerves is not as effective as that from native nerves in axolotl muscle (Holder, Mills & Tonge, 1982) and that the foreign synapses can be completely suppressed following return of the native nerves (Dennis & Yip, 1978;Bennett, McGrath & Davey, 1979). If the segmental nerves to an axolotl muscle are cut, the topographical projection onto the muscle is re-established on reinnervation, after a transient period in which inappropriate connexions are formed and then eliminated (Cass & Mark, 1975;Bennett & McGrath, 1980).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%