2017
DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2017.1389267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The reformists: Kalahi and the performances of local government officials in Bohol, Philippines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Porio (2016) points out that governance reforms with public participation gave the mayor room to legitimately form networks and alliances with civil society organizations and private enterprises, leading to the legalization and justification of client-patron relationships (Porio 2016: 32). In fact, case studies of community-driven development in Bohol island reveal that the patron-client relationship survived and poverty alleviation was slow to progress, even as the project took place (Reid 2011;Poncin 2019). As a series of case studies on 2016 local elections depicts, money politics and patron-client relations between local politicians and constituencies endure in the Philippines (Hicken, Aspinall, and Weiss 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Porio (2016) points out that governance reforms with public participation gave the mayor room to legitimately form networks and alliances with civil society organizations and private enterprises, leading to the legalization and justification of client-patron relationships (Porio 2016: 32). In fact, case studies of community-driven development in Bohol island reveal that the patron-client relationship survived and poverty alleviation was slow to progress, even as the project took place (Reid 2011;Poncin 2019). As a series of case studies on 2016 local elections depicts, money politics and patron-client relations between local politicians and constituencies endure in the Philippines (Hicken, Aspinall, and Weiss 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%