1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8500.1994.tb01492.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Reform Role of Chief Executives: Accountability, Leadership and Licence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fiscal pressures on government became apparent in the USA in the 1990s and led to various ‘reinventing’ initiatives, blending drives to both streamline and start to ‘marketize’ government by increased contracting out and similar measures (Osborne and Gaebler ). The fiscal impact was felt even earlier in the Anglophone world as the UK, New Zealand, and Australia all launched aggressive public sector reform programmes aimed at reducing government size and privatizing many government operations in the 1980s (Chapman ; Mascarenhas ), often under the banner called the New Public Management (Martin 1999; Scott ). Continental Europe and Japan carried out less fundamental reform focusing on modernization only, but for rather different reasons (Pollitt and Bouchaert ).…”
Section: Effects Of Changing Context On Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fiscal pressures on government became apparent in the USA in the 1990s and led to various ‘reinventing’ initiatives, blending drives to both streamline and start to ‘marketize’ government by increased contracting out and similar measures (Osborne and Gaebler ). The fiscal impact was felt even earlier in the Anglophone world as the UK, New Zealand, and Australia all launched aggressive public sector reform programmes aimed at reducing government size and privatizing many government operations in the 1980s (Chapman ; Mascarenhas ), often under the banner called the New Public Management (Martin 1999; Scott ). Continental Europe and Japan carried out less fundamental reform focusing on modernization only, but for rather different reasons (Pollitt and Bouchaert ).…”
Section: Effects Of Changing Context On Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%