1995
DOI: 10.1016/0021-8928(95)00067-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The reflection of beams of internal gravity waves at a flat rigid surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the form of solutions (3.2) differs significantly from (3.1), all the expressions remain finite. The solutions of the two-dimensional wave emission problem, obtained as the limiting case of the three-dimensional problem, are, in general, consistent with [14].…”
Section: Solutions Of the Dispersion Equation And Their Behavior In Tsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Although the form of solutions (3.2) differs significantly from (3.1), all the expressions remain finite. The solutions of the two-dimensional wave emission problem, obtained as the limiting case of the three-dimensional problem, are, in general, consistent with [14].…”
Section: Solutions Of the Dispersion Equation And Their Behavior In Tsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…(The implication of breaking on the fluid is discussed in Section 3.3.) In contrast to these inviscid results, viscosity and diffusion stabilize a steady solution even at the critical angle (Kistovich & Chashechkin 1995).…”
Section: Focusing By Wall Reflectionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…where is the kinematic viscosity and K is the magnitude of the wave vector (Kistovich and Chashechkin 1995). After reflection, changes in K must then be compensated with changes in , especially when focusing of the wave rays produces larger values of K. For low-period attractors, viscous diffusion then balances geometrical focusing of the rays and the motion concentrates in a shear layer around the attracting trajectory, as is shown numerically by Dintrans et al (1999) and Rieutord et al (2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%