1989
DOI: 10.1002/j.1467-8438.1989.tb00743.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Reflecting Team Process In Training

Abstract: The process of evolution of a reflecting team in live supervision sessions is discussed. Theoretical ramifications for systemic training of systemic family therapy are explored and feedback from trainer, trainees and client families about the use of the reflecting team is presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is some consensus in the literature about the guidelines for the use of language in the R.T.P. For instance, Young et al (1989) Davidson et al (1988) and Roberts et al (1989) also stress the need for reflecting team members to be sensitive, respectful and speculative (though not necessarily positively connoting). However, to our knowledge there is no discussion around the issue of pushing or not pushing for change.…”
Section: Goals That Emphasise Setting a Context For Change Not Specimentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There is some consensus in the literature about the guidelines for the use of language in the R.T.P. For instance, Young et al (1989) Davidson et al (1988) and Roberts et al (1989) also stress the need for reflecting team members to be sensitive, respectful and speculative (though not necessarily positively connoting). However, to our knowledge there is no discussion around the issue of pushing or not pushing for change.…”
Section: Goals That Emphasise Setting a Context For Change Not Specimentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Authors suggest various room configurations, from the team remaining silent behind a one-way mirror until the family overhears their discussions (Andersen, 1987;Young et al, 1989) to keeping an imaginary boundary in the same room between the family and team (Davidson et al, 1988;Smith, Jenkins, & Sells, 1995) to the therapist and client of the same gender speaking alone in the room while members of the other gender watch from behind the mirror (Miller & Lax, 1988). Additionally, the reflecting team has been described as composed of as few as one member (Wangberg, 1991) to as many as seven members (Young et al, 1989). Beyond the size of the team, the composition of the team is considered more important than the type of family seen or the severity of the presenting problem (Young et al, 1989).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the reflecting team has been described as composed of as few as one member (Wangberg, 1991) to as many as seven members (Young et al, 1989). Beyond the size of the team, the composition of the team is considered more important than the type of family seen or the severity of the presenting problem (Young et al, 1989). Some suggest that the reflecting team should be composed of only therapists and the family (Andersen, 1987); others suggest it be balanced by team members of both genders (Sells, Smith, Coe, Yoshioka, & Robbins, 1994;Smith et al, 1995) or by a combination of therapists, clients, and peers (Aderman & Russell, 1990).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Young et al (1989) reported that the trainer in their study enjoyed RT work because it was consistent with her ''egalitarian values.'' However, more recently, Young et al (1997) found that, while trainers thought the RT format leveled the hierarchy, trainees did not always agree.…”
Section: Attending To Power and Hierarchy: Intent Does Not Guarantee mentioning
confidence: 81%