The reference: more than a buttress of the scientific edifice

Schott, G D

doi:10.1258/jrsm.96.4.191

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Primary research forms the backbone of an evidence base; however, non-specialists may lack the resources or expertise to evaluate the appropriateness of methodology and data analysis in primary studies, and to identify trends and patterns across multiple studies. Furthermore, the inherent complexity and variability of natural systems combined with differences in study methods typically generates findings that can be selectively used to support particular conclusions [1,2]. Against this backdrop, non-specialists seeking an overview of particular topics (e.g.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evidence maps and evidence gaps: evidence review mapping as a method for collating and appraising evidence reviews to inform research and policy

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evidence reviews are a key mechanism for incorporating extensive, complex and specialised evidence into policy and practice, and in guiding future research. However, evidence reviews vary in scope and methodological rigour, creating several risks for decision-makers: decisions may be informed by less reliable reviews; apparently conflicting interpretations of evidence may obfuscate decisions; and low quality reviews may create the perception that a topic has been adequately addressed, deterring new syntheses (cryptic evidence gaps). We present a new approach, evidence review mapping, designed to produce a visual representation and critical assessment of the review landscape for a particular environmental topic or question. By systematically selecting and describing the scope and rigour of each review, this helps guide non-specialists to the most relevant and methodologically reliable reviews. The map can also direct future research through the identification of evidence gaps (whether cryptic or otherwise) and redundancy (multiple reviews on similar questions). We consider evidence review mapping a complementary approach to systematic reviews and systematic maps of primary literature and an important tool for facilitating evidence-based decisionmaking and research efficiency.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%