2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2020.105912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The reference method influence on the sensitivity of the Clostridium difficile enzyme immunoassays: A meta analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite its low sensitivity (58.8 %), EIA presents high specificity (reaching almost 100%), and it is a common procedure used for the detection of C. difficile. Moreover, the optimal approach for the detection of C. difficile infection is still a matter of debate [38,39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite its low sensitivity (58.8 %), EIA presents high specificity (reaching almost 100%), and it is a common procedure used for the detection of C. difficile. Moreover, the optimal approach for the detection of C. difficile infection is still a matter of debate [38,39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the optimal approach for the detection of C. difficile infection is still a matter of debate [38, 39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%