2008
DOI: 10.1504/ejie.2008.016330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The reference installation approach for the estimation of industrial assets at risk

Abstract: When natural disasters and extreme events such as storms, floods and earthquakes occur, it is not only people, residential buildings and infrastructure that are seriously affected, but also industry. Direct losses to installations as well as indirect losses, e.g., the interruption of production, can cause severe damage to companies and the economy as a whole. For a comparative and quantitative risk assessment, and being a prerequisite for Michael Hiete holds a diploma and a PhD in Geoecology, both from the Tec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…would also be worthwhile, but may be more difficult to assess than the residential assets because of the wide variety of industries and their susceptibility (Seifert et al, 2010). Bottom-up approaches, such as the reference installation approach developed by Geldermann et al (2008), seem most appropriate to capture this heterogeneity if the available data allows it.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…would also be worthwhile, but may be more difficult to assess than the residential assets because of the wide variety of industries and their susceptibility (Seifert et al, 2010). Bottom-up approaches, such as the reference installation approach developed by Geldermann et al (2008), seem most appropriate to capture this heterogeneity if the available data allows it.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires a large number (hundreds) of model evaluations. In flood damage assessments this is mainly hampered by the estimation of inundation depths as the models used for this (2-dimensional hydrodynamic flow models) are computationally very demanding (Gouldby and Kingston, 2007;Apel et al, 2008). The study by Apel et al (2008) is a good example of applying MC to estimate uncertainty in flood risk modelling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a thorough evaluation of the method, further comparison with more empirical data on the stock of fixed assets would be reasonable. In a future project, the developed method will be compared with the ''reference installation approach,'' a method that estimates industrial asset values on the basis of similar installations due to similar industrial processes (Geldermann et al 2007). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limitations exist if the error mechanism or the overall system is not properly understood [2], which is more and more difficult given the increasing complexity of assets. These patterns cannot be predicted for a single asset, but can only be predicted by looking at reference plants [12].…”
Section: Increasing System Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since vulnerability is not static, it is even more difficult to measure risk [14]. For example, age and quality of maintenance have an enormous influence on how susceptible a production asset is to failure [12].…”
Section: Subjective and Dynamic Risk Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%