22nd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference 2016
DOI: 10.2514/6.2016-2900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Reduction of Main Landing Gear Noise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, with respect to aeronautics, typically only the first or second height mode resonance is considered when designing to avoid aeroacoustic cavity noise, such as from burst-disk cavities or vent holes. However, for much larger volumes, such as landing-gear wheel bays or missile bays, higher-order modes have been shown to be excitable within the velocity range of aircraft on approach to landing [49][50][51][52], and as such, deserve to be examined in the literature.…”
Section: A Numerical Analysis: Wave Expansion Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, with respect to aeronautics, typically only the first or second height mode resonance is considered when designing to avoid aeroacoustic cavity noise, such as from burst-disk cavities or vent holes. However, for much larger volumes, such as landing-gear wheel bays or missile bays, higher-order modes have been shown to be excitable within the velocity range of aircraft on approach to landing [49][50][51][52], and as such, deserve to be examined in the literature.…”
Section: A Numerical Analysis: Wave Expansion Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain a better understanding of the actual noise emissions of LG systems, wind-tunnel [12,[14][15][16][17] and aircraft flyover experiments [4,9] are typically performed. Whereas the first case offers more controlled flow conditions, it requires the LG model being tested to have a high level of geometric detail to represent the small-scale sound generating mechanisms of the gear [4,5] and it is difficult to replicate the exact conditions present at an aircraft in flight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wind-tunnel experiments were performed under the European Clean Sky funded ALLEGRA (Advanced Low Noise Landing (Main and Nose) Gear for Regional Aircraft) project, coordinated by Trinity College Dublin. This project was developed to assess low-noise technologies applied to a full-scale NLG model [15,16] and a half-scale MLG model [17] of a regional aircraft. ALLEGRA consisted of a consortium of universities (Trinity College Dublin and KTH), an aeroacoustic wind-tunnel company (Pininfarina SPA), and European SME manufacturing and design partners (Eurotech and Teknosud) supported by a leading landing gear manufacturer (Magnaghi Aeronautica).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practical cases, such as for aircraft take-off and landing where the flow speed varies, it is important to be able to predict these modes so that mitigation measures can be implemented for all modes excited. Recent research published from EU Green Regional Aircraft Clean Sky projects [19][20][21] have demonstrated success in the reduction of nose and main landing gear noise on full and half scale models with the use of low noise technologies. However, the wheel bays continue to be a significant noise source, and for approach and landing, velocities were found to radiate tones at both the Helmholtz resonance frequency of the nose landing gear wheel bay 22 and also at frequencies which were higher than the first, and most typically studied, depth mode for both the nose and main landing gear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%