1990
DOI: 10.1016/0040-6031(90)87011-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The reduction behaviour of silica-supported copper catalysts prepared by deposition-precipitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some have reported the same reduction temperature for copper phyllosilicate and well dispersed CuO[1,21]. Others have reported lower reduction temperature for well dispersed CuO compared with copper phyllosilicate[67,68]. In the present study, we are inclined to agree with the latter results because the electron density of O in the CuO is higher than that of copper24 phyllosilicate (as shown in Scheme 2a-c), which might be more readily combinedwith H 2 .…”
supporting
confidence: 52%
“…Some have reported the same reduction temperature for copper phyllosilicate and well dispersed CuO[1,21]. Others have reported lower reduction temperature for well dispersed CuO compared with copper phyllosilicate[67,68]. In the present study, we are inclined to agree with the latter results because the electron density of O in the CuO is higher than that of copper24 phyllosilicate (as shown in Scheme 2a-c), which might be more readily combinedwith H 2 .…”
supporting
confidence: 52%
“…7a, all the samples exhibit a center of H 2 consumption peak at about 194 C, which could be attributed to the collective effect from highly dispersed CuO to Cu 0 and copper phyllosilicate to Cu 2 O. The further reduction of Cu 2 O to Cu 0 requires a high temperature above 600 C. [37][38][39] However, a small H 2 consumption peak located at 212 C for 5% Y and 10% La doped Cu/SiO 2 catalysts may be caused by conversion of large CuO particles to Cu, in accordance with the XRD diffraction peaks of the calcined catalysts in Fig. 5a.…”
Section: H 2 -Tpr and H 2 -Tpdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported by van der Grift et al. 30,31 After reduction, the characteristic structure of ZnO·SiO 2 still remained in Cu 2 Zn 2 Si 4 , whereas CuO was reduced. The XRD Peaks at 2 = 50.44°, and 74.10° for Cu species were more visible when calcination temperature was increasing, which clearly shows that the crystal size of Cu increased with the increasing calcination temperatures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 83%