2010
DOI: 10.3386/w16509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Redistributive Effects of Political Reservation for Minorities: Evidence from India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Pande (2003) reports of an increase in job quotas for SCs in places with more SC politicians (but no effect on spending on education or welfare spending for SCs), whereas Chin and Prakash (2011) find no effects of SC representation on poverty. Both studies report strong effects of representation for Scheduled Tribes on spending.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 Pande (2003) reports of an increase in job quotas for SCs in places with more SC politicians (but no effect on spending on education or welfare spending for SCs), whereas Chin and Prakash (2011) find no effects of SC representation on poverty. Both studies report strong effects of representation for Scheduled Tribes on spending.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Two important exceptions are Pande (2003) and Chin and Prakash (2011), who studied the effects of quotas in state assemblies on public spending by state governments and state-level poverty.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also several recent papers on employment quota programs outside of the United States. Recent studies by Howard and Prakash (2012), Chin andPrakash (2011), andPrakash (2009), for example, have examined the effect of Indian minority hiring quotas on employment outcomes and occupational choice of favored groups. These studies find that these programs increased the probability of finding a salaried job for some types of favored groups, and that this improved employment outcome was associated with higher household consumption expenditures and higher skilled occupational choice.…”
Section: Background: Previous Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, studies of women’s political influence (Ban and Rao 2008; Clots-Figueras, 2007, 2011) have considered relatively few indicators of investments in schooling. This district-level analysis extends others in India focused on the reservation of local seats for women (Chattopadhyay and Duflo 2004) as well as state and local seats for SC/ST legislators (Chin and Prakash 2011; Munshi and Rosenzweig 2008; Pande 2003). 5 This analysis helps to shed some light on the reasons for inequities in the distribution of a mandated public good in a setting where inequities in human resources can exceed those across the world’s nations.…”
Section: Indian Contextmentioning
confidence: 56%