2012
DOI: 10.1093/icc/dts036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Red Queen in action: The longitudinal effects of capital investments in the mobile telecommunications sector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, our study shows that technology advancement is not the only way to counteract competition. Our findings contribute to understanding of the effects of competition on innovation (Banker, Cao, Menon & Mudambi, 2013), an area in which few studies question the payoff of unceasing innovation investments (Sawhney & Nambisan, 2007). In addition, we highlight the type and extent of competitive conditions that lead a firm to choose to opt out of innovation, bolstering the view that a firm innovating at a pace much faster than that of its competitors can harm itself (Talay & Townsend, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, our study shows that technology advancement is not the only way to counteract competition. Our findings contribute to understanding of the effects of competition on innovation (Banker, Cao, Menon & Mudambi, 2013), an area in which few studies question the payoff of unceasing innovation investments (Sawhney & Nambisan, 2007). In addition, we highlight the type and extent of competitive conditions that lead a firm to choose to opt out of innovation, bolstering the view that a firm innovating at a pace much faster than that of its competitors can harm itself (Talay & Townsend, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Our study offers several practical implications to firms and government agencies that deal with technology competition. First, managerial understanding of technology competition is largely characterized as Red Queen competition—firms continue to innovate to stay in the arms race, and firms that do not innovate will be retired by competition (Banker, Cao, Menon, & Mudambi, ; Barnett & Sorenson, ). This view of competition overlooks the question of whether gains from innovation are sufficient to justify the costs of racing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The opportunities and challenges stemming from boundary spanning are particularly relevant in knowledge‐intensive environments, where technological opportunities emerge rapidly; existing competencies quickly become obsolete; and intense rivalry and competition among industry participants prevail (D'Aveni et al, ). In such environments, for example, telecommunications and pharmaceuticals, spanning organizational and national boundaries to obtain novel knowledge is considered pivotal to an organization's competitive advantage (Banker et al, ; Bierly et al, ; Chesbrough et al, ). At the same time, managing knowledge across boundaries in those environments is extremely challenging as the underlying knowledge is characterized by novelty (e.g., rapid technological advancements or changing customer requirements), strong differences between the MNC and the potential source of knowledge (e.g., due to specialization or size effects) and dependencies (i.e., the MNC relies to some extent on external actors to ultimately make productive use of the external knowledge) (Carlile, ; Carlile and Rebentisch, ).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, whether a cluster has the ability to translate innovation into the overall well-being of the cluster is questionable. Using the firm data in the mobile telecommunication services sector, Banker et al (2013) found that R&D investments positively relate to current and future productivity, but only to future profitability. Similarly, as noted earlier, the Detroit auto cluster may not be able to effectively absorb its own innovation output, and the strengthening of innovation capabilities could not effectively help reverse the decline of the Detroit auto cluster (Hannigan et al, 2015).…”
Section: Interfirm Cooperation Innovativeness and Cluster Performancementioning
confidence: 99%