1974
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(74)90009-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The recovery cycle of the averaged auditory evoked response during sleep in autistic children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies of the auditory AER during sleep in 23 autistic children aged from 22 months to 8 years suggested that the normal phasic inhibition of the auditory AER to clicks synchronous with bursts of eye movements during REM sleep is overridden in autistic children ). Other studies of the recovery cycle of the AER during sleep have demonstrated normal responses in a group of 28 autistic children aged from 30 months to 5.6 years (mean age 4.2 years) suggesting that the disordered modulation of sensory input in autis-tic children is either not reflected in the recovery process or is not apparent during sleep (Ornitz et al 1974(Ornitz et al , 1972. However, there is suggestive evidence that autistics may be more sensitive to differences in interstimulus intervals than are normals (Ornitz et al 1972).…”
Section: Cortical Activitymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Studies of the auditory AER during sleep in 23 autistic children aged from 22 months to 8 years suggested that the normal phasic inhibition of the auditory AER to clicks synchronous with bursts of eye movements during REM sleep is overridden in autistic children ). Other studies of the recovery cycle of the AER during sleep have demonstrated normal responses in a group of 28 autistic children aged from 30 months to 5.6 years (mean age 4.2 years) suggesting that the disordered modulation of sensory input in autis-tic children is either not reflected in the recovery process or is not apparent during sleep (Ornitz et al 1974(Ornitz et al , 1972. However, there is suggestive evidence that autistics may be more sensitive to differences in interstimulus intervals than are normals (Ornitz et al 1972).…”
Section: Cortical Activitymentioning
confidence: 92%