1966
DOI: 10.1109/swat.1966.30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The recognition problem for the set of perfect squares

Abstract: Lower bound~on the capacity and on the product of capacity and computation time are obtained for machines which recognize the set of squares. The bound on capacity is approached to within a factor of four by a specific machine which carries out a test based on the fact that every non-square is a quadratic non-residue of some rational prime. A machine which carries out a te st based on the standard root-extraction algorithm is substantially Ie ss efficient in this respect. For neither machine is the bound on th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a result already appears in Cobham [4], where he shows that for recognizing the set of perfect squares (or for recognizing {w $ WR}) we must have T. S l)(n 2) for any computational device (including a multitape T. M.) having a separate one head-mad only input tape. Here T number of steps, $ "capacity"= log2 (number of configurations the machine enters when processing all strings of length n).…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such a result already appears in Cobham [4], where he shows that for recognizing the set of perfect squares (or for recognizing {w $ WR}) we must have T. S l)(n 2) for any computational device (including a multitape T. M.) having a separate one head-mad only input tape. Here T number of steps, $ "capacity"= log2 (number of configurations the machine enters when processing all strings of length n).…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Each node of the computation graph represents a distinct state of the computation. Like Cobham [4], it is profitable for us to ignore completely how (and So this will be our approach for establishing the analogous main lemma: We assert that, with sufficiently high probability, at a leaf of an R-tree program the elements that we have seen on this path will be "spread out" in such a way that there is only a small probability (i.e., for only a small fraction of all possible input sequences) that we will correctly output S ranks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let BP(f ) be the minimal size of any branching program computing f . A Boolean function f has a polynomialsize branching program iff f belongs to L/poly [9], the complexity class of logarithmic space machines with a polynomial amount of advice. Branching program for functions f : {0, 1} χ → {0, 1} with non-Boolean output can be constructed in a natural way.…”
Section: Branching Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As but four examples: Cobham [6] discovered a time-space trade-off for the problem of palindrome recognition; Borodin et al [2] found a similar trade-off for the problem of sorting; Thompson [24] discovered an area-time trade-off for the problem of implementing the DFT in VLSI; and Hong [8] uncovered a trade-off involving reversal and space complexity for Turing machines. It is not a priori obvious that cost tradeoffs exist in the simple world of graph embeddings; but in fact, such trade-offs can be found quite easily.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%