1995
DOI: 10.1300/j104v19n03_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Reclassification Decision:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 The editors of the DDC's 17th edition, published in 1965, relocated almost 700 classification numbers within the scheme, forcing libraries either to split collections, to reclassify older materials, or to ignore the changes as a matter of local practice. 7 Taylor's 1965 article "Reclassification: A Case for LC in the Academic Library," describes the case of the University of Puget Sound (UPS) Library and its decision to reclassify to LCC. 8 Before deciding to make the switch, the library contacted libraries around the country that had recently changed from DDC to LCC and found that their main reason for switching to LCC was that it was a standardized system created and maintained by the largest library in the country, the Library of Congress.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 The editors of the DDC's 17th edition, published in 1965, relocated almost 700 classification numbers within the scheme, forcing libraries either to split collections, to reclassify older materials, or to ignore the changes as a matter of local practice. 7 Taylor's 1965 article "Reclassification: A Case for LC in the Academic Library," describes the case of the University of Puget Sound (UPS) Library and its decision to reclassify to LCC. 8 Before deciding to make the switch, the library contacted libraries around the country that had recently changed from DDC to LCC and found that their main reason for switching to LCC was that it was a standardized system created and maintained by the largest library in the country, the Library of Congress.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Libraries usually tend to select a classification scheme or make reclassification decisions based on the classification schemes’ advantages. Switching between classification schemes was found to be a result of various classification relocations, suitability, flexibility, stabilization, standardization and efficiency (Chressanthis, 1995; Lund and Agbaji, 2018; Patterson, 2019). Video games are important collections in libraries, which would make classifiers in libraries face many issues if the adopted classification scheme does not support them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%