1984
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.1984.1063070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The reciprocity integral: Convolution or correlation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is customary to replace the ratio H 1 /I by h. When applied to magnetic recording, equation (27) states that the flux linkage between head and medium can be calculated using the medium magnetization and the field that would be produced by the read head when excited with a unit current. If the medium moves with a velocity v, the flux linkage is…”
Section: Reciprocity and Read-back Of Sinusoidal Magnetization Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is customary to replace the ratio H 1 /I by h. When applied to magnetic recording, equation (27) states that the flux linkage between head and medium can be calculated using the medium magnetization and the field that would be produced by the read head when excited with a unit current. If the medium moves with a velocity v, the flux linkage is…”
Section: Reciprocity and Read-back Of Sinusoidal Magnetization Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(28) The reciprocity integral is a correlation (not a convolution) between the magnetization and the head field [27]. Mathematically, it is more convenient to use equation (28) in the following form:…”
Section: Reciprocity and Read-back Of Sinusoidal Magnetization Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the 'magnetic recording equivalent' to (4) describing the readout voltage e, (per unit turn and per unit track width in the y direction) arising from an identical sample magnetization distribution as above but with the MFM tip replaced by an inductive readout head is -m where H F d is the head field that would be produced by the readout head if it were energized by unit current [6]. It is clear that (4) and (5) are not exactly equivalent, since in the former we differentiate the (tiplhead) field with respect to z, whereas in the latter it is the magnetization that is differentiated and with respect to the x direction.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, one first calculated the flux emanating from a known or assumed sample magnetization distribution, then evaluated the timederivative of the portion of that flux that linked the readout head [ 3 ] . The application of the reciprocity theorem to this readout process showed that identical results are achieved by calculating the field that would be produced by an energized readout head and correlating this with the magnetization distribution in the recording medium [4]. Using this approach the important role played by the head itself in the readout process was explicitly revealed, leading to new head designs with improved responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…An attempt to end the confusion between correlation and convolution was made in [5]. That paper stated that the confusion between correlation and convolution simply reverses time flow in readback.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%