2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnt.2018.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The reciprocal sum of primitive nondeficient numbers

Abstract: We investigate the reciprocal sum of primitive nondeficient numbers, or pnds. In 1934, Erdős showed that the reciprocal sum of pnds converges, which he used to prove that the abundant numbers have a natural density. We show the reciprocal sum of pnds is between 0.348 and 0.380.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the sum of densities for each S a is dominated by g(q), that is, gives the density of nondeficient numbers recently shown in [12] to lie in the tight interval (0.2476171, 0.2476475). In [14], an analog of Proposition 2.1 is a key ingredient for sharp bounds on the reciprocal sum of the primitive nondeficient numbers.…”
Section: Proposition 21 For Any Primitive Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the sum of densities for each S a is dominated by g(q), that is, gives the density of nondeficient numbers recently shown in [12] to lie in the tight interval (0.2476171, 0.2476475). In [14], an analog of Proposition 2.1 is a key ingredient for sharp bounds on the reciprocal sum of the primitive nondeficient numbers.…”
Section: Proposition 21 For Any Primitive Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reciprocal sums reflect the distribution of number sets. Convergent sums have been bounded for consecutive primes differing by 2 [1], amicable pairs [8] and primitive nondeficient numbers [7] that are consistent with the order estimates for the cardinality of the sets less than a given integer [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…[2] Prior work on these sets have looked at their density. See especially [1] as well as [7] and [11]. In fact, the arguments used in this paper can be thought of as variations of the techniques used in [1].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%