2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The reciprocal relation between morphological awareness and spelling in Chinese: A longitudinal study of primary school students

Abstract: Spelling is a literacy skill that must be mastered during children’s academic development. It involves a variety of cognitive factors, including morphological awareness. Studies in the alphabet and Chinese systems have shown that there is a close relationship between morphological awareness and spelling. Although there is clearly a significant unidirectional effect of morphological awareness on spelling significantly, few studies have explored the bidirectional relationship between morphological awareness and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, it was also supported by the fact that the students' possible highest score in the Morpheme Identification Test was in inflected form (in an inflected compound word), and the possible lowest score was in derived form. The study conducted by Badawi (2019), Li et al (2020), andZhang (2021) proved that there is an increasing robustness of the relationship between morphological awareness and written composition across time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In addition, it was also supported by the fact that the students' possible highest score in the Morpheme Identification Test was in inflected form (in an inflected compound word), and the possible lowest score was in derived form. The study conducted by Badawi (2019), Li et al (2020), andZhang (2021) proved that there is an increasing robustness of the relationship between morphological awareness and written composition across time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%