Recent publications of Burnet and his school gave a full account of the properties of an enzyme found in the culture filtrates of V. cholerae. The effect of standard preparations {Stone, 1947a;Burnet and Stone, 1947) is identical on red cells (McCrea, 1947; Stone, 1947b}, the respiratory lining of excised lungs (Pazekas de St.Groth, 1948) and glycoproteins of various origin which act as Francis inhibitors (Anderson aud McCrea, 1948); the preparations render all these biological and chemical materials incapable of adsorbing viruses of the influenza group or release these viruses artificially from the adsorbed state. The "receptors" of virus adsorption are destroyed-at least in the biological senseby their action. As the effectiveness of the preparations is not significantly reduced during prolonged and repeated action, the active principle is considered to be an enzyme, the "l'eceptor destroying enzyme" (RDE) of V. cholerae.The above-mentioned investigations made the therapeutic possibilities of RDE evident, as it is the "receptors" which would form the point at which the infective particle and the future host ceil make their first contact. Unless there are receptor spots on the .surface of the susceptible cell to which virus could be adsorbed, infection would not be realized. An extensive study was made by on the prophylactic and therapeutic value of HDE. In the allantoic cavity a suitable dose of the enzyme-though it has no direct effect on the virus at all-prevents infection of the embryo to a significant degree, with some strains of virus against approximately 1,000 LDgoThese findings undeniably bear out that RDE has essentially the same effect in the living organism as in lifele.ss models, and that in the absence of receptors the virus is incapable of establishing infection. However, the results obtained have by no means the all-or-nothing character of similar expei'iments carried out in vitro. The influence of standard doses of the enzyme varied widely according to the strain of virus used, the time elapsing between the administration of RDE and the dose of virus, and the order of administration. Relatively large amouiits of enzyme were required, the effect diminishing disproportionately when the amount was rednced.