2001
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The recent structural evolution of the SMC

Abstract: Abstract.We investigate the spatial distribution of stars of different ages towards the main body of the SMC, in an attempt to further understand the nature of the complex structure of the SMC. The old stellar population of the galaxy shows a rather regular and smooth distribution which is typical for a spheroidal body. On the contrary, the distribution of the younger stellar component is highly asymmetric and irregular giving evidence for the severe impact of the SMC during its close encounter with the LMC so… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
65
0
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
6
65
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are in agreement with the Efremov & Elmegreen model, where star complexes are part of a continuous star formation hierarchy, following the hierarchical distribution of the gas (Elmegreen & Efremov 1996), and star formation proceeds slower in larger star forming regions than in smaller ones (Elmegreen & Efremov 1996;Efremov & Elmegreen 1998). Similar conclusions were drawn from previous studies of the LMC (Maragoudaki et al 1998;Livanou et al 2006) and the SMC (Maragoudaki et al 2001;). However, it is not clear from this study whether the first group of detected star complexes, extended from ∼150 pc to ∼300-400 pc, is characterized by lower average ages than the second one, extended from ∼400 pc to ∼800 pc.…”
Section: Hierarchical Star Formationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These findings are in agreement with the Efremov & Elmegreen model, where star complexes are part of a continuous star formation hierarchy, following the hierarchical distribution of the gas (Elmegreen & Efremov 1996), and star formation proceeds slower in larger star forming regions than in smaller ones (Elmegreen & Efremov 1996;Efremov & Elmegreen 1998). Similar conclusions were drawn from previous studies of the LMC (Maragoudaki et al 1998;Livanou et al 2006) and the SMC (Maragoudaki et al 2001;). However, it is not clear from this study whether the first group of detected star complexes, extended from ∼150 pc to ∼300-400 pc, is characterized by lower average ages than the second one, extended from ∼400 pc to ∼800 pc.…”
Section: Hierarchical Star Formationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…They also explain that the presence of the Bar or a strong tidal disturbance confer extra streaming motion to a system and thus old and young populations can have distinct kinematics. The strong interactions of the SMC with the LMC and the MilkyWay that have probably contributed to the formation of the Bar (Maragoudaki et al 2001) could also have as a result the observed difference in the centres of the distributions of the stellar and the gas component as well as the small radial velocity gradient among SMC stars (Bekki & Chiba 2008), that contradicts the exponential profile of the stellar component. Stanimirovic et al (2004) suggest that according to SMC rotation curve, a dark matter halo is not needed to explain itt's dynamics.…”
Section: The Center Offsetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AGB and RGB stars are characterised by a regular but double peaked structure, an offset from the HI distribution, and a mean age difference of the two maxima of their star count map. Maragoudaki et al (2001) studied the spatial distribution of the SMC stellar population according to their age, based on optical data. They have shown that the older stellar population shows a rather regular and smooth distribution, while the youngest stellar component (age less than 8 × 10 6 yr) appears mainly along the northeast-southwest direction, forming the Bar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 to 25 are only available in electronic form at the CDS via anonymous ftp to cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr (130.79.128.5) or via http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/qcat?J/A+A/554/A16 due to the recent interaction has been revealed in the morphological evolution of the LMC and SMC (Maragoudaki et al 1998(Maragoudaki et al , 2001.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%