2019
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab425b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Recent Burstiness of Star Formation in Galaxies at z ∼ 4.5 from Hα Measurements

Abstract: The redshift range z = 4 − 6 marks a transition phase between primordial and mature galaxy formation in which galaxies considerably increase their stellar mass, metallicity, and dust content. The study of galaxies in this redshift range is therefore important to understand early galaxy formation and the fate of galaxies at later times. Here, we investigate the burstiness of the recent star-formation history (SFH) of 221 z ∼ 4.5 main-sequence galaxies at log(M/M ) > 9.7 by comparing their ultraviolet (UV) conti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
76
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 187 publications
(264 reference statements)
16
76
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that this theoretical definition of stochastic star formation differs from estimates from observations (e.g. Faisst et al 2019). While we can follow the SFHs of galaxies at each epoch, observational estimates of SFHs are typically based on two data points (SFR in the last 10 and 100 Myrs through measuring the H𝛼 line and UV luminosity, respectively) and a chosen SFH shape.…”
Section: Characterizing the Sfhcontrasting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We note that this theoretical definition of stochastic star formation differs from estimates from observations (e.g. Faisst et al 2019). While we can follow the SFHs of galaxies at each epoch, observational estimates of SFHs are typically based on two data points (SFR in the last 10 and 100 Myrs through measuring the H𝛼 line and UV luminosity, respectively) and a chosen SFH shape.…”
Section: Characterizing the Sfhcontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…The trend of stochastic star formation being prevalent in lower mass galaxies is in rough agreement with observational findings. Using a sample of observed galaxies with stellar masses of 10 8.5 M < M ★ < 10 11.5 M at 𝑧 ∼ 4.5, Faisst et al (2019) find that the excess of H𝛼 luminosity compared to UV luminosity decreases with increasing stellar mass, indicating a reduced burstiness of the SFH of massive galaxies. However, in their sample, high mass galaxies (𝑀 ★ > 10 10 M ) show signs of recent bursts of star formation, which are not present in our simulations.…”
Section: Fractional Stellar Mass Assembled and Lifetime Spent In Stoc...mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The differential dust attenuation between nebular emission and stellar continuum is by far the largest contribution to the total uncertainty. There is observational evidence that the 𝑓 −factor of 𝑧 > 2 galaxies is closer to 0.7 than the locally measured value of 0.44 (Kashino et al 2017;Faisst et al 2019;Rodriguez-Munoz et al prep). In the case of 𝑓 = 0.7, the dust attenuation factors would decrease by a factor of 1.5 (0.18 dex change in luminosity) on average for our sample.…”
Section: The [O ]−Sfr Relation At 𝑧 ∼ 45mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…A growing number of observations have identified a tight relation (σ 0.3 dex - (Daddi et al 2007;Whitaker et al 2012;Schreiber et al 2015;Kurczynski et al 2016) between the SFR and M (the so-called main sequence of star-forming galaxies - Noeske et al 2007) up to z ∼ 6−7 (e.g., Labbé et al 2010b;Bouwens et al 2012;Stark et al 2013;González et al 2014;Duncan et al 2014;Steinhardt et al 2014;Salmon et al 2015;Song et al 2016;Jiang et al 2016;Santini et al 2017;Iyer et al 2018;Pearson et al 2018;Khusanova et al 2020;Faisst et al 2019). Indeed, a correlation between the SFR and M is predicted by models (e.g., Finlator et al 2007Finlator et al , 2011Finlator et al , 2018Dekel et al 2009;Davé et al 2011;Lu et al 2014;Mancuso et al 2016;Wilkins et al 2017;Ma et al 2018;Ceverino et al 2018;Rosdahl et al 2018;Tacchella et al 2018).…”
Section: Sfr-m At Z >mentioning
confidence: 99%