2004
DOI: 10.1002/ejic.200300448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The “Rebound Controversy”: An Overview and Theoretical Modeling of the Rebound Step in C−H Hydroxylation by Cytochrome P450

Abstract: C−H hydroxylation by the enzyme cytochrome P450 is one of Nature’s important and most ubiquitous processes. There is strong evidence that the mechanism proceeds by initial hydrogen abstraction, from the alkane, by the high‐valent iron−oxo species of the enzyme, followed by a rebound of the alkyl radical to form the ferric−alcohol product complex (the Groves “rebound” mechanism). Nevertheless, the “rebound” mechanism is still controversial due to the ultrashort radical lifetimes deduced from radical‐clock exper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
246
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(267 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(160 reference statements)
21
246
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The s* z 2 orbital depends critically on the nature of the axial ligand; this orbital is quite high for a thiolate ligand which is a strong binder of iron, [53] but will get much lower for a ligand such as imidazole, sulfates, and water, which are weaker iron binders. [53] The s* xy orbital is not affected by changes in the axial ligand. However, both orbitals are strongly affected by replacing the iron by another transition metal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The s* z 2 orbital depends critically on the nature of the axial ligand; this orbital is quite high for a thiolate ligand which is a strong binder of iron, [53] but will get much lower for a ligand such as imidazole, sulfates, and water, which are weaker iron binders. [53] The s* xy orbital is not affected by changes in the axial ligand. However, both orbitals are strongly affected by replacing the iron by another transition metal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[39] When the species are calculated in the presence of a dielectric medium and two NH--S hydrogen bonds, the radical character on the alkyl group decreases and the charge transfer exceeds 0.6; the two species are tight ion pairs with a significant delocalization of the charge. [39,53] Under all environmental conditions there is spin density of unity on the iron, which has an Fe III oxidation state. In contrast, in the 4,2 2 rad species, the spin density on the alkyl moiety is close to unity and the degree of charge transfer is substantially lower:~0.3.…”
Section: -Ivmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the rebound barriers of substrate hydroxylation by the iron(IV)-oxo species of P450 enzymes gives negligible barriers on the doublet spin state surface. [14,33,41] By contrast, significant rebound barriers of 17.7 kcal mol À1 for hydroxyl rebound to n-C 3 H 7 C (Figure 4) and 23.1 kcal mol À1 for hydroxyl rebound to CH 3 C were calculated.…”
Section: De°¼ Fg H àB ð5þmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most extensively studied reaction pathway is aliphatic hydroxylation [24][25][26][27], which happens via a stepwise mechanism with an initial hydrogen atom abstraction to form an iron(IV)-hydroxo intermediate, followed by OH transfer-also called rebound-to the radical to give the alcohol product complexes. With most substrates, the hydrogen atom abstraction step is rate-determining, while the rebound barrier is much smaller [28]. In particular, the doublet spin state mechanism tends to have negligible rebound barriers, while they are generally higher on the quartet spin state surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With most substrates, the hydrogen atom abstraction step is rate-determining, while the rebound barrier is much smaller [28]. In particular, the doublet spin state mechanism tends to have negligible rebound barriers, while they are generally higher on the quartet spin state surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%