2010
DOI: 10.1037/a0022082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Real Relationship Inventory: Development and psychometric investigation of the client form.

Abstract: The development and validation of a client version of the Real Relationship Inventory (RRI-C) is reported. Using a sample of clients (n = 94) who were currently in psychotherapy, a 24-item measure was developed consisting of two subscales (Realism and Genuineness) and a total score. This 24-item version and other measures used for validation were completed by 93 additional clients. Results of the present study offer initial support for the validity and reliability of the RRI-C. The RRI-C correlated significant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
111
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
111
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Real Relationship Inventory (RRI; Kelley, Gelso, Fuertes, Marmarosh, Lanier, 2010) measures the personal relationship between the client and therapist. It consists of two 12-item subscales (Realism and Genuineness) rated on 5-point scales (1 = strongly agree, 5 = strongly disagree).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Real Relationship Inventory (RRI; Kelley, Gelso, Fuertes, Marmarosh, Lanier, 2010) measures the personal relationship between the client and therapist. It consists of two 12-item subscales (Realism and Genuineness) rated on 5-point scales (1 = strongly agree, 5 = strongly disagree).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testretest reliability has been demonstrated to be .88 for genuineness, .84 for realism, and .87 for the total score. The RRI is positively related to ratings of the working alliance (r = .79) and therapist ratings of the real relationship (r = .60) and negatively related to client avoidant attachment (r = -.40) (Kelley et al, 2010, Marmarosh, Gelso, Markin, Majors, Mallery, & Choi, 2009). This study used a 12-item version of the measure that was first used in Hill et al (2013), which consists of the 12 items believed to best encompass the theoretical components of the measure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, each item assessed how much genuineness or realism existed, as well as how positive versus negative were the client's perceptions of the genuineness and realism of the client, the therapist, and their relationship. The Reahsm and Genuineness subscales were found to be highly interrelated (r = .80; Kelley et al, 2010). Examples of items are "My therapist and I were able to be authentic in our relationship" (Genuineness item) and "My therapist's perceptions of me were accurate" (Realism item).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Horney, 1950 ;Kelman et al , 1953 ); and (3) his theoretical view has been extended to include additional dimensions of value (magnitude, valence, and Self or Other; Gelso, 2002Gelso, , 2003Gelso, , 2004Gelso, , 2009aGelso, , 2011 and has begun to receive increasing empirical support ( Ain and Gelso, 2008 ;Fuertes et al , 2007 ;Gelso, 2006 ;Gelso et al , 2005 ;Kelley et al , 2010 ;Marmorosh et al , 2008 ) .…”
Section: The Real Relationship: Considering Its Place In Psychoanalytmentioning
confidence: 99%