2009
DOI: 10.1037/a0015169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The real relationship in psychotherapy: Relationships to adult attachments, working alliance, transference, and therapy outcome.

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to understand how the real relationship (RR) relates to important process and outcome variables from both the clients' and therapists' perspectives. Using a sample of 31 therapist/client dyads at a university counseling center, the authors examined the RR at the 3rd session of therapy and at termination. The results revealed that client adult attachment avoidance was negatively correlated with client RR, while client adult attachment anxiety was uncorrelated. Therapists' ratings o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

14
141
5
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
14
141
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Testretest reliability has been demonstrated to be .88 for genuineness, .84 for realism, and .87 for the total score. The RRI is positively related to ratings of the working alliance (r = .79) and therapist ratings of the real relationship (r = .60) and negatively related to client avoidant attachment (r = -.40) (Kelley et al, 2010, Marmarosh, Gelso, Markin, Majors, Mallery, & Choi, 2009). This study used a 12-item version of the measure that was first used in Hill et al (2013), which consists of the 12 items believed to best encompass the theoretical components of the measure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testretest reliability has been demonstrated to be .88 for genuineness, .84 for realism, and .87 for the total score. The RRI is positively related to ratings of the working alliance (r = .79) and therapist ratings of the real relationship (r = .60) and negatively related to client avoidant attachment (r = -.40) (Kelley et al, 2010, Marmarosh, Gelso, Markin, Majors, Mallery, & Choi, 2009). This study used a 12-item version of the measure that was first used in Hill et al (2013), which consists of the 12 items believed to best encompass the theoretical components of the measure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Academic scholarship has shown support that receiving "doses" of connectedness based on experiencing the real relationship does improve psychological well-being. The therapist's perception of the real relationship has been shown to predict the reduction of patient posttreatment symptoms, indicating that the real relationship can provide positive outcomes within psychotherapy (Marmarosh et al 2009). In addition, patientrated genuineness of the real relationship and therapeutic bond were related to improved outcomes in a brief therapy intervention (Lo Coco et al 2011).…”
Section: The Real Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Like the present study, Marmarosh et al (2009) andLo Coco et al (2011) assessed outcome at the end of treatment. Fuertes et al (2007) and Ain and Gelso (2011), however, studied what was termed progress because all of their participants were at different points in their treatment when the strength of the real relationship and "outcome" were assessed.…”
Section: The Client's Vantage Pointmentioning
confidence: 98%