1978
DOI: 10.1108/eb050623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The readability of guides to the literature

Abstract: Readability is usually taken to mean the ease of comprehension of written materials and is expressed numerically. In this project, readability scores for eight guides to the literature were calculated using three readability methods. These were the Dale‐Chall, Flesch Reading Ease and Smog Grading methods. Correlation coefficients between the methods were calculated and they proved significant at the 5 per cent level. The effect of jargon words on the Dale‐Chall method is discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Out of a handful of articles, one theme was explored by at least four authors, that of readability. While Jackson (1984) provided tips on how to make pathfinders more readable to the average user, Mayes (1978) and Peterson and Coniglio (1987, p. 470) measured readability with the use of statistical tests. Jackson stressed the importance of choosing meaningful titles for the guides and for the section headings within and to be sure to begin headings with action verbs.…”
Section: Traditional Pathfindersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of a handful of articles, one theme was explored by at least four authors, that of readability. While Jackson (1984) provided tips on how to make pathfinders more readable to the average user, Mayes (1978) and Peterson and Coniglio (1987, p. 470) measured readability with the use of statistical tests. Jackson stressed the importance of choosing meaningful titles for the guides and for the section headings within and to be sure to begin headings with action verbs.…”
Section: Traditional Pathfindersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the few studies in this field are A Survey of Subject Guides to Sources of Information Produced by Library and Information Services in the United Kingdom (Taylor, 1978) conducted by ASLIB, Mayes' (1978) investigation of the readability of guides to the literature, and Kapoun's (1995) discussion of criteria for the evaluation of guides. Anson and Woodward (1992) and Surles (1989) surveyed legal research guides, while Allen (1993) surveyed essential business reference sources.…”
Section: Domain Analysis In Information Science 423mentioning
confidence: 99%