The reaction27Al(d, p)28Al in the energy range of the deuteron from 2.0 MeV to 3.0 MeV

Differential cross-sections for nuclear reactions on Al and Si induced by deuterons at low energy (1–2MeV)

“…The first cross-section curves for aluminium and silicon were respectively measured by Gadioli et al [1] and by Wildenthal et al [2] at 135°. Since that time, very few studies have been published [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. For silicon, papers report investigations based on c-ray detection from the (d,pc) reactions [3], or studies at high energy (>2 MeV) [2,8].…”

“…For silicon, papers report investigations based on c-ray detection from the (d,pc) reactions [3], or studies at high energy (>2 MeV) [2,8]. For aluminium, both reactions at high energy [4][5][6] or at two different detection angles (173° [9] and 90° [10]) were studied. More recently, new data from Gurbich and Molodtsov have been introduced in IBANDL [12].…”

Reversible Phase Transformation in Polycrystalline TRIP Steels Induced by Cyclic Indentation Performed at the Nanometric Length Scale

“…This phenomenon, which is well studied and understood for Si and other semiconductor materials at the nanometric length scale, had never been observed before for metastable stainless steels and in particular for the TRIP steels. As can be clearly observed in the literature, this behavior can be related to three different factors: 1) reversible amorphization under load, 2) annealing treatments, and 3) reversible phase transformation . Pan et al by means of cyclic nanoindentation tests on NiTi shape memory alloys observed the same phenomenon described above, which may be related to stress‐induced martensitic transformation during the unloading process.…”

Measurement of (d,p) and (d,α) differential cross-sections for aluminum

“…7 and 8 the data obtained in the present work for the 27 Al(d,p) 28 Al reaction are in a good agreement with the cross-sections reported in [8] whereas the agreement with the data from [9] is only partial. The cross-sections reported in [10] are underestimated by a factor $2. For the 27 Al(d,a) 25 Mg reaction the fair agreement is observed with the data from [8] and the agreement with the cross-sections from [9] is poor.…”