The reaction time of mediated responses

Katz, Sanford

doi:10.1007/bf03393502

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(c) The range of AI employed here does not affect utilization of the mediation process involved. This last possibility draws some support from the work of Katz (1963), which has suggested that at least under his training conditions, effective mediation may take place in less time than the shortest AI duration (1 sec.) used in the present experiment.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 87%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Transfer as a function of time to mediate.

Spear¹,

Mikulka²,

Podd³

1966

Journal of Experimental Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 87%

“…Additional sets of evidence lend support to this easily reconcilable suggestion that mediators may be used more effectively the longer the anticipation interval (cf. Katz, 1963;Schulz & Lovelace, 1964).…”

Section: Rutgers Universitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Transfer as a function of time to mediate.

Spear¹,

Mikulka²,

Podd³

1966

Journal of Experimental Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Previous experiments which suggest an interaction between transfer and AI have compared different experiments (Richardson, 1965b;Schulz & Lovelace, 1964) or have not been statistically significant (Richardson, 1965a;Runquist & Marshall, 1963). Katz (1963) has presented the only clear evidence that verbalmediating responses require time to occur.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mediated transfer in paired-associate learning as a function of presentation rate and stimulus meaningfulness.

Richardson¹,

Brown²

1966

Journal of Experimental Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The 1st experiment varied the anticipation interval and the pairpresentation interval during the learning of the A-C list in a B-C, A-B, A-C mediation paradigm. The Russell and Storms (1955) material showed significant amounts of mediated transfer but there was no suggestion of an interaction between mediation and either of the intervals. The 2nd experiment varied stimulus meaningfulness and anticipation interval on the A-D list after learning an A-C, A-B, A-X, or E-X list constructed from the Russell and Storms material. Stimulus meaningfulness, anticipation interval, and lists were effective variables and there was an interaction between lists and stimulus meaningfulness but no interaction between lists and anticipation interval. The results were discussed in terms of an associative probability theory.

show abstract

“…Therefore, the present failure to obtain an interaction between mediation and either study or test time strongly indicates that mediation processes are not influenced by temporal factors. Katz (1963) demonstrated that a mediated response can take additional time, but his materials and procedure differed markedly from those used in the present study. He made time comparisons for responses which were mediated by 0, 1, or 2 mediators.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 77%