1980
DOI: 10.1002/9780470142608.ch4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Reaction F + H2→ Hf + H

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The multiple experimental data for k 1 at room temperature (293-300 K) [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] were analyzed in previous evaluations. 1,25 Persky and Kornweitz 1 considered that the most accurate results for k 1 available at that moment were those of Clyne and Hodgson, 22 Wurzberg and Houston, 8 and Stevens et al, 7 and recommended The absolute values of k 1 measured by Heidner et al 5 are by a factor of 1.4-1.7 higher than the current data, and the difference increases with temperature. The values of k 1 measured by Igoshin et al 26 at two temperatures (195 and 296 K), although considered in previous reviews as rather uncertain, 1,25 and those reported by Homann et al 27 (in a rather narrow temperature range 300-400 K) are also in a reasonable agreement with the present measurements.…”
Section: Rate Constant Of Reaction (1): Relative Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The multiple experimental data for k 1 at room temperature (293-300 K) [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] were analyzed in previous evaluations. 1,25 Persky and Kornweitz 1 considered that the most accurate results for k 1 available at that moment were those of Clyne and Hodgson, 22 Wurzberg and Houston, 8 and Stevens et al, 7 and recommended The absolute values of k 1 measured by Heidner et al 5 are by a factor of 1.4-1.7 higher than the current data, and the difference increases with temperature. The values of k 1 measured by Igoshin et al 26 at two temperatures (195 and 296 K), although considered in previous reviews as rather uncertain, 1,25 and those reported by Homann et al 27 (in a rather narrow temperature range 300-400 K) are also in a reasonable agreement with the present measurements.…”
Section: Rate Constant Of Reaction (1): Relative Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…1,25 Persky and Kornweitz 1 considered that the most accurate results for k 1 available at that moment were those of Clyne and Hodgson, 22 Wurzberg and Houston, 8 and Stevens et al, 7 and recommended The absolute values of k 1 measured by Heidner et al 5 are by a factor of 1.4-1.7 higher than the current data, and the difference increases with temperature. The values of k 1 measured by Igoshin et al 26 at two temperatures (195 and 296 K), although considered in previous reviews as rather uncertain, 1,25 and those reported by Homann et al 27 (in a rather narrow temperature range 300-400 K) are also in a reasonable agreement with the present measurements. Ioffe et al 6 determined k 1 at T = 293-700 K in a discharge flow system with direct detection of fluorine atom decays in excess of H 2 by electron spin resonance method.…”
Section: Rate Constant Of Reaction (1): Relative Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study adds weight to, or challenges some of the propositions that have been developed by Anderson andTaylor (2007) on the matter of cultural diversity as concerns the socialization of girls. The present study is to be understood together with study conducted by Anderson and Taylor (2007), which have attempted a comparative analysis of girls in different societies. By providing a comparative analysis of the situation, the present study develops a body of information on the similarities and differences with regard to the informal social activities of English girls and Indian girls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical reaction networks can be considered as Birth-and-Death processes without memory, which are Markov processes in a multidimensional space, this point of view was studied by Anderson [ 9 ] and Van Kampen [ 8 ]. While the roots to formulate properly the CME based on microphysical principles were established by Gillespie [ 6 , 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%