The reaction 55Mn(, t)54Mn

Cameron, J. A.; Habib, E.E.; Pilt, A.A.; Schubank, R.; Janzen, V. P.

doi:10.1016/0375-9474(81)90390-0

Cited by 9 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Experimental angular distributions of particle emission in deuteron-induced DRs on 55 Mn there are only for the (d, p) stripping [22] and (d, t) pick-up [41,42] reactions. A detailed analysis of the former reaction at 7.5 MeV incident energy has made possible the calculation of almost total (d, p) stripping contribution to the population of 56 Mn residual nucleus nucleus, of 129 discrete levels up to the excitation energy of ∼ 5.6 MeV [22,39].…”

Section: Direct Reactionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A detailed analysis of the former reaction at 7.5 MeV incident energy has made possible the calculation of almost total (d, p) stripping contribution to the population of 56 Mn residual nucleus nucleus, of 129 discrete levels up to the excitation energy of ∼ 5.6 MeV [22,39]. On the other hand, the pick-up (d, t) cross-section calculations concerned the analysis of the triton angular distributions measured at incident energies of 17 [41] and 18 [42] MeV for 30 discrete levels up to ∼ 3.7 MeV [40][41][42]. The suitable description of the measured proton (Fig.…”

Section: Direct Reactionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, due to the missing data on (d, n) stripping [22] and calculated (solid curves) proton angular distributions of 55 Mn(d, p) 56 Mn stripping transitions to states with excitation energies in MeV, at the incident energy of 7.5 MeV. [41,42] and calculated (solid curves) triton angular distributions of 55 Mn(d, t) 54 Mn pick-up transitions to states with excitation energies in MeV, at the incident energies of 18 and 17 MeV.…”

Section: Direct Reactionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Deuteron-induced reactions on manganese at low energies

Avrigeanu¹,

Šiméčková

Fischer

et al. 2020

Phys. Rev. C

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The scarce data systematics and complexity of deuteron interactions demand the update of both the experimental database and theoretical frame of deuteron activation cross sections. Various reactions induced by neutrons and protons following the deuteron breakup (BU) should be also taken into account. On the other hand, deuteron reaction cross sections recommended recently for high-priority elements are still based on data fit without predictive power.Purpose: Accurate new measurements of low-energy deuteron-induced reaction cross sections for monoisotopic ( 55 Mn) natural manganese target enhance the related database as well as the opportunity of an unitary and consistent account of the related reaction mechanisms.Methods: Activation cross sections of 54,56 Mn, and 51 Cr nuclei by deuterons on 55 Mn were measured at energies ≤20 MeV by the stacked-foil technique and high resolution gamma spectrometry at the U-120M cyclotron of CANAM, NPI CAS. Then all available data for deuterons on 55 Mn up to 50 MeV are analyzed paying particular attention to BU and direct reaction (DR) mechanisms.Results: Newly measured activation cross sections strengthen the deuteron database at low energies, at once with a consistent account for the first time of all available data.Conclusions: Due account of deuteron-induced reactions on 55 Mn, including particularly the new experimental data at low energies, is provided by a suitable BU and DR assessment.

show abstract

Section: Direct Reactionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Direct Reactionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Direct Reactionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Deuteron-induced reactions on manganese at low energies

Avrigeanu¹,

Šiméčková

Fischer

et al. 2020

Phys. Rev. C

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The SSMn(d~ t)54Mn experiment by Cameron et al [3] is one of the very few performed with a polarized beam on an fp-shell nucleus. To illustrate the close resemblance that can be obtained between theory and experiment the results for this reaction are given in Table 2.…”

Section: Accuracy Of the Spectroscopic Factorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For the transfer reactions on even-even targets the strengths could be separated into the different j-contributions, except for the case 52Cr~53Cr where several J-assignment are uncertain. For odd targets the orbital angular momenta only are determined, except in the reaction 55Mn~5r for which detailed vector analysing power measurements have been performed [3]. In many cases most of the expected summed strength is found, see Fig.…”

Section: J I +mentioning

confidence: 99%

Proton and neutron occupation numbers forfp-shell nuclei

Mooy

Glaudemans

1984

Z Physik A

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Spectroscopic factors for single-particle transfer are calculated from many-particle shellmodel wave functions for 23 different transfer reactions on fp-shell nuclei. A comparison of the present theory with the available experimental data is very successful. Subshell occupation numbers of target ground states are studied in detail. Some systematic deficiencies for low seniority shell-model wave functions are revealed. In several cases the experimental information appears to be rather incomplete.

show abstract