The reaction 23Na(p, p) in the range 8.0–12.0 MeV

Hellström, John; Dallimore, P.J.; Davidson, W.F.

doi:10.1016/0375-9474(69)90720-9

Cited by 13 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…differential cross-section is given by Ema x 1S the maximum available energy of the residual nuclei in channel c". It is close to the values obtained for 9Be(d, p)l~ [5], 12C(d, d)12C [36], and 23Na(p,p)23Na [37] in a similar energy range; we mention this without further discussion. Compound elastic enhancement is accounted for by the factor (1 + 6cc,).…”

Section: Compound Nucleus Contributionssupporting

confidence: 89%

Mechanism of reactions induced by 7 MeV deuterons on9Be [(d, p), (d, d), (d, t), (d,4He)]

Szczurek

Bodek

Krug

et al. 1989

Z. Physik A - Atomic Nuclei

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Angular distributions of protons, deuterons, tritons and alpha-particles emitted from the reactions in the d + 9Be-system at Ee = 7 MeV as well as excitation functions at selected angles in the energy range Ea= 6.5-7.5 MeV (LAB) were measured. The potential part of the elastic scattering is described by the phenomenological optical model. The compound nucleus contribution to all exit channels is determined using the Hauser-Feshbach model. The collective excitation of the 2.43 MeV excited state of 9Be and transfer processes are analysed within the DWBA formalism. The analyses suggest a significant contribution of five-nucleon transfer to the (d, 4He) channel. Nuclear Reactions: 9Be(d, p), 9Be(d, d), 9Be(d, t), 9Be(d, 4He), measured: a(O), Ela b = 7 MeV, o-(O, E), Elab = 6.5-7.5 MeV, optical model, Hauser-Feshbach model and DWBA analysis.

show abstract

Section: Compound Nucleus Contributionssupporting

confidence: 89%

Mechanism of reactions induced by 7 MeV deuterons on9Be [(d, p), (d, d), (d, t), (d,4He)]

Szczurek

Bodek

Krug

et al. 1989

Z. Physik A - Atomic Nuclei

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A direct reaction flux into non elastic channels may explain this difference between theory and experiment, since the HF theory assumes that all the flux removed from the shape elastic channel contributes to the compound formation cross section. If some of this flux goes into direct reaction channels the HF cross section must be reduced to describe the compound cross section [10,31]. Together with other non elastic direct reactions direct (e, n)-transitions are possible.…”

Section: Direct Reactionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Non statistical reaction contributions in (?, n) excitation functions

Gruhle

Möbius

1977

Z Physik A

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The excitation function 24Mg(e, n)278i has been measured from threshold to 27 MeV excitation energy. A survey is given of the experimental excitation functions * 2C(e, n) a sO, 160(e, n)19Ne, Z~ n)Z3Mg and 24Mg(e, n)27Si and HF calculations have been made for them. The agreement is good within a factor of 2. The deviations of the experimental data from the pure statistical cross sections show common structures which can be interpreted as direct contributions.

show abstract

Departures from the Statistical Model

Mahaux

1974

Nuclear Structure Study With Neutrons

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The reaction 23Na(p, p) in the range 8.0–12.0 MeV

Cited by 13 publications

References 34 publications

Mechanism of reactions induced by 7 MeV deuterons on9Be [(d, p), (d, d), (d, t), (d,4He)]

Mechanism of reactions induced by 7 MeV deuterons on9Be [(d, p), (d, d), (d, t), (d,4He)]

Non statistical reaction contributions in (?, n) excitation functions

Departures from the Statistical Model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About