2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10817-013-9280-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Reachability Problem in Constructive Geometric Constraint Solving Based Dynamic Geometry

Abstract: An important issue in dynamic geometry is the reachability problem that asks whether there is a continuos path that, from a given starting geometric configuration, continuously leads to an ending configuration. In this work we report on a technique to compute a continuous evaluation path, if one exists, that solves the reachability problem for geometric constructions with one variant parameter. The technique is developed in the framework of a constructive geometric constraint-based dynamic geometry system, use… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When updating the intersection point o 1 ∩ o 2 between times t i and t i+1 , the ambiguity is typically solved with a continuity argument, i.e., selecting at time t i+1 the solution which is the closest to the intersection point at time t i . A well-known problem in dynamic geometry occurs when two curves no more intersect [21][22][23]. This problem also occurs in our approach and is related to the Persistent Naming Problem discussed in Section 6.…”
Section: Dags For Dynamic Geometrymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…When updating the intersection point o 1 ∩ o 2 between times t i and t i+1 , the ambiguity is typically solved with a continuity argument, i.e., selecting at time t i+1 the solution which is the closest to the intersection point at time t i . A well-known problem in dynamic geometry occurs when two curves no more intersect [21][22][23]. This problem also occurs in our approach and is related to the Persistent Naming Problem discussed in Section 6.…”
Section: Dags For Dynamic Geometrymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…[5,6,23]. In these fields, knowing beforehand which is the set of values for λ such that the geometric construction can actually be built plays a central role.…”
Section: Computing Dependences In 1 Dof Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method was formalized in [5,6] where a correctness proof along with specific implementation details were given.…”
Section: Computing Dependences In 1 Dof Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations