The Reach of the “Don’t Fry Day” Twitter Campaign: Content Analysis

Abstract

Background Skin cancer is the most common cancer in the United States, disproportionately affecting young women. Since many young adults use Twitter, it may be an effective channel to communicate skin cancer prevention information. Objective The study aimed to assess the reach of the National Council on Skin Cancer Prevention (NCSCP)’s 2018 Don’t Fry Day Twitter campaign, categorize the types of individuals or tweeters who engaged in the campaign, and identify themes of the tweets. Methods Descriptive statistics were used, and a content analysis of Twitter activity during the 2018 Don’t Fry Day campaign was conducted. The NCSCP tweeted about Don’t Fry Day and skin cancer prevention for 14 days in May 2018. Twitter contributors were categorized into groups. The number of impressions (potential views) and retweets were recorded. Content analysis was used to describe the text of the tweets. Results A total of 1881 Twitter accounts, largely health professionals, used the Don’t Fry Day hashtag, generating over 45 million impressions. These accounts were grouped into nine categories (eg, news or media and public figures). The qualitative content analysis revealed informative, minimally informative, and self-interest campaign promotion themes. Informative tweets involved individuals and organizations who would mention and give further context and information about the #DontFryDay campaign. Subthemes of the informative theme were sun safety, contextual, and epidemiologic information. Minimally informative tweets used the hashtag (#DontFryDay) and other types of hashtags but did not give any further context or original material in the tweets. Self-interest campaign promotion involved businesses, firms, and medical practices that would utilize and promote the campaign to boost their own ventures. Conclusions These analyses demonstrate the large potential reach of social media public health campaigns. However, limitations of such campaigns were also identified, for example, the relatively homogeneous groups actively engaged in the campaign. This study contributes to the understanding of the types of accounts and messages engaged in social media campaigns utilizing a hashtag, providing insight into the messages and participants that are effective and those that are not to achieve campaign goals. Further research on the potential impact of social media on health behaviors and outcomes is necessary to ensure wide-reaching implications.

Musawah: A Data-Driven AI Approach and Tool to Co-Create Healthcare Services with a Case Study on Cancer Disease in Saudi Arabia

“…The content analysis identified three themes: health-related expressiveness, health information, and health advice. Nguyen et al [34] developed a methodology that aimed to evaluate the influence of the campaign (Don't Fry Day) by the National Council on Skin Cancer Prevention (NCSCP)'s 2018 on Twitter, categorize types of accounts participating in the campaign, and determine the themes of the tweets. The dataset was collected from 1881 Twitter accounts.…”

Real-time Twitter interactions during World Breastfeeding Week: A case study and social network analysis

“…Over the last five years, several groups have implemented Twitter awareness campaigns focused on breast cancer [ 10 ], skin cancer [ 11 ], mental health [ 12 ], cardio-oncology [ 13 ], HPV vaccination [ 14 ], and breastfeeding [ 15 , 16 ]. Independent of the varied content, audience, and duration across the studies, the methods used to assess campaigns were limited to one or several of the following approaches: content analysis of tweets; survey-based assessment of users’ knowledge; and/or quantitative analysis of Twitter Analytics metrics.…”

Effects of a brief multimodal online intervention on the intention to conduct sun protective behaviours through targeting illness representations about skin cancer: a randomized controlled trial

“…Even though much effort has been put in primary prevention campaigns over the last decades (e.g., Doran et al, 2016;Nguyen et al, 2019;Stratigos et al, 2012), the regular engagement in sun protective behaviours is not yet widespread and sunburns are still prevalent. For example, three German studies found that 41% of the respondents had at least 1 sunburn in the previous year, that up to 17% of the respondents never use sunscreen, that only 30% of the respondents avoid sunbathing, and that only about half of the respondents regularly wear long-sleeved clothes, stay in the shade, and use sunscreen, respectively (Forsa & DAK Gesundheit, 2016;Engelhardt, 2016;G€ orig et al, 2018).…”