2022
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The reach of next-to-leading-order perturbation theory for the matter bispectrum

Abstract: We provide a comparison between the matter bispectrum derived with different flavours of perturbation theory at next-to-leading order and measurements from an unprecedentedly large suite of N-body simulations. We use the χ2 goodness-of-fit test to determine the range of accuracy of the models as a function of the volume covered by subsets of the simulations. We find that models based on the effective-field-theory (EFT) approach have the largest reach, standard perturbation theory has the shortest, and ‘classic… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our algorithm completely eliminates the need (still present in [45]) for an ansatz to be put forward at every perturbative step to identify the solution. This is a striking improvement, especially relevant as the community has been increasingly recognising the importance of tackling higher orders in PT [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55]. Moreover, we derive explicit perturbative solutions for time-dependent coefficients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Our algorithm completely eliminates the need (still present in [45]) for an ansatz to be put forward at every perturbative step to identify the solution. This is a striking improvement, especially relevant as the community has been increasingly recognising the importance of tackling higher orders in PT [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55]. Moreover, we derive explicit perturbative solutions for time-dependent coefficients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Note that the same argument applies to the stochastic bias parameter in the general bias method. For a comparison of the range of validity of a few different methods at 𝑧 = 1, see Alkhanishvili et al (2022) Here we see significant redshift evolution, with the first point inconsistent with 5% going from ∼ 0.2 ℎ/Mpc at 𝑧 = 0 to ∼ 0.375 ℎ/Mpc at 𝑧 = 3. Right: The error for the three LO+NLO models sees a similar redshift evolution, going from diverging at ∼ 0.2 ℎ/Mpc at 𝑧 = 0 to ∼ 0.5 ℎ/Mpc at 𝑧 = 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…12,14,18,[20][21][22][23]. For example, the EFTofLSS extends the k-reach of the models for the matter power spectrum by a factor of 2-3 [24]. The formalism has also incorporated biased tracers [e.g.…”
Section: Jcap01(2024)051mentioning
confidence: 99%