2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00989.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The rate of senescence in maternal performance increases with early‐life fecundity in red deer

Abstract: Tradeoffs between reproduction and somatic maintenance are a frequently cited explanation for reproductive senescence in long-lived vertebrates. Between-individual variation in quality makes such tradeoffs difficult to detect and evidence for their presence from wild populations remains scarce. Here, we examine the factors affecting rates of senescence in maternal breeding performance in a natural population of red deer (Cervus elaphus), using a mixed model framework to control for between-individual variance.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

18
253
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 223 publications
(278 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(51 reference statements)
18
253
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The within-individual repeatability of parturition date ranged from 0.54 to 0.93 among populations. In birds, repeatability of laying date range between 0.10 and 0.61 [18,19], whereas the only available value for a mammal was 0.10 (in red deer, derived from Nussey et al [10]), suggesting that repeatability in roe deer is particularly high. This high repeatability suggests a low level of phenotypic plasticity for this trait and, therefore, little potential for a rapid response to drastic changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The within-individual repeatability of parturition date ranged from 0.54 to 0.93 among populations. In birds, repeatability of laying date range between 0.10 and 0.61 [18,19], whereas the only available value for a mammal was 0.10 (in red deer, derived from Nussey et al [10]), suggesting that repeatability in roe deer is particularly high. This high repeatability suggests a low level of phenotypic plasticity for this trait and, therefore, little potential for a rapid response to drastic changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimated repeatability of laying date varies among bird species [9]. However, estimation of both within-and amongpopulation repeatability of parturition date has been overlooked in mammals (but see [10]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a range of contributory effects, including additive genetic, non-additive genetic and permanent environmental effects have been demonstrated in some populations (e.g. Coulson et al 2006;Nussey et al 2006;Foerster et al 2007), simultaneous estimation of these effects while correcting for individual variation in age-specific reproductive trajectories will prove quite challenging. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longitudinal studies over the whole lifespan that tease these effects apart remain very scarce in both mammals (Gaillard et al 1994;Nussey et al 2006) and birds (Cam et al 2002;Reid et al 2003). Here, we make use of an exceptional long-term dataset in the long-lived mute swan (Cygnus olor) to investigate within-individual changes with age in reproductive performance (laying date and clutch size) while controlling for potential covariance between individual quality and longevity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These traits were longevity, mean adult body condition, success at last breeding before death [three modalities: no reproduction code 0, reproduction but offspring died before the next summer code 1, and reproduction with offspring that survived code 2] and age at last reproduction). Longevity is often associated with performance in other life‐history traits (Nussey, Kruuk, Donald, Fowlie, & Clutton‐Brock, 2006) and is a commonly used trait to assess individual quality (Moyes et al., 2009; Espie, James, Oliphant, Warkentin, & Lieske, 2004; Hamel, Cote et al., 2009; Hamel, Gaillard et al., 2009; 2010; Weladji et al., 2006). Even if correlated, age at death and age at last reproduction differ for 28% of the females with a mean difference of 2.5 ± 1.05 years (maximum = 7 years).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%