1978
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The rate of recovery of vision after early monocular deprivation in kittens

Abstract: 3. The initial effects of monocular deprivation were graded in severity according to the age at which the deprivation was imposed, ranging from apparent blindness in animals deprived at 6 weeks of age to only a small loss of acuity in kittens deprived at 12 weeks of age.4. The effects of deprivation imposed from birth were particularly severe, leading to a temporary blindness. Nevertheless after a period of time that became progressively longer with increasing deprivation, all animals showed some recovery of p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

6
110
2

Year Published

1981
1981
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
110
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The anatomical and physiological changes observed in V1 as a consequence of early monocular deprivation are accompanied by a loss of visual acuity in the DE, the severity of which depends on when the deprivation began and its duration (Giffin & Mitchell 1978). On the other hand, the loss of binocularly excitable cells in animals reared with exotropia is accompanied by a loss of stereoscopic vision without any appreciable impairment of the vision of either eye (Mitchell 1988).…”
Section: Early Experience and Development Of Vision And Visual Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anatomical and physiological changes observed in V1 as a consequence of early monocular deprivation are accompanied by a loss of visual acuity in the DE, the severity of which depends on when the deprivation began and its duration (Giffin & Mitchell 1978). On the other hand, the loss of binocularly excitable cells in animals reared with exotropia is accompanied by a loss of stereoscopic vision without any appreciable impairment of the vision of either eye (Mitchell 1988).…”
Section: Early Experience and Development Of Vision And Visual Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenge to models based on binocular competition stems from the fact that restoration of normal visual input to the deprived eye without concurrent manipulation of the visual input to the nondeprived eye does little or nothing to reduce the very substantial competitive advantage of this eye. Past measurements of the speed of recovery of visual acuity of the deprived eye after MD during BR suggest that it may rival that observed with reverse lid-suture (RLS), where the formerly nondeprived eye is deprived to provide a competitive advantage to the formerly deprived eye (5,7,9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, not all experimental findings can be readily accommodated by mechanisms based on binocular competition. A striking case in point is the substantial recovery of both ocular dominance in the visual cortex of cats and of the vision of the deprived eye in cats and humans after MD in the situation (binocular recovery, BR) where both eyes are open during the recovery period (5)(6)(7)(8). The challenge to models based on binocular competition stems from the fact that restoration of normal visual input to the deprived eye without concurrent manipulation of the visual input to the nondeprived eye does little or nothing to reduce the very substantial competitive advantage of this eye.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A classic finding of mammalian visual plasticity studies is that monocular deprivation (MD) causes lasting physiological effects, a shift of ocular dominance (OD) away from the deprived eye in binocular primary visual cortex (V1) (Wiesel and Hubel, 1963;Hubel and Wiesel, 1970), and behavioral changes, a loss of spatial vision (amblyopia) through the deprived eye (Giffin and Mitchell, 1978), only if deprivation occurs during a "critical" period in juvenile life. Recent physiological studies in mice (Sawtell et al, 2003;Pham et al, 2004;Hofer et al, 2006) have challenged the notion of a restricted period of OD plasticity in cortex by showing that MD in adulthood causes a transient enhancement of responses selectively through the nondeprived eye.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%