2006
DOI: 10.2138/am.2006.1860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The rate of ferrihydrite transformation to goethite via the Fe(II) pathway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
122
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
14
122
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The induction times observed in this study are generally in accordance with the findings of Yee et al (6) at ambient temperature when 2-line ferrihydrite was reacted with concentrated 100mM Fe(II) solution. However, in their study, goethite was the only transformation product detected, in contrast to the observations from this study and those cited above.…”
Section: Reconciliation Of the Controversies In Previous Studiessupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The induction times observed in this study are generally in accordance with the findings of Yee et al (6) at ambient temperature when 2-line ferrihydrite was reacted with concentrated 100mM Fe(II) solution. However, in their study, goethite was the only transformation product detected, in contrast to the observations from this study and those cited above.…”
Section: Reconciliation Of the Controversies In Previous Studiessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…There are also inconsistent reports on which transformation product formed in experiments conducted under similar conditions. Yee et al (6) reported a transformation product of goethite only for the reaction of 2-line ferrihydrite with 100 mM Fe(II), which is inconsistent with the results of magnetite formation at much lower Fe(II) concentrations in the studies of Hansel et al (4). Tronc et al (5) reported the topotactic transformation of freshly synthesized 2-line ferrihydrite to magnetite as a result of mixing with Fe(II) solution, while Hansel et al (4) attributed the transformation to magnetite mainly to nucleation and recrystallization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(II) The influence of temperature on the precipitation behavior was analyzed by conducting experiments at five temperatures (4,12,21,30,40 • C) for a 50 mmol·L −1 CaSO 4 solution. (III) Finally, the effect of additives on the precipitation of calcium sulphate was studied for 50, 75, 100 and 150 mmol·L −1 CaSO 4 solutions at 21 • C. One additive, Mg, which enhances the solubility of CaSO 4 , was introduced, replacing the Na + ions with Mg 2+ ions in stoichiometric conditions (MgSO 4 ·7H 2 O and CaCl 2 ·2H 2 O were used as reactants, and a 1:1 Ca 2+ /Mg 2+ ratio was maintained for all cases).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model applies to specific solid-state phase transformations. However, it has also been used to fit other nucleation-and-growth processes exhibiting sigmoidal conversion kinetics, such as crystal formation from solution and melts [21,22]. For solid-state phase transformations, the value of n is usually related to the mechanism of nucleation and the dimensionality of growth.…”
Section: Saxs and Waxs Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation