1973
DOI: 10.1037/h0034666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The rat's anticipation of two meals a day.

Abstract: Rats were maintained on two meals a day, at 10:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., for 1 mo. while confined to activity wheels. During this time the animals developed anticipatory running, i.e., increased activity just prior to each meal. Because the anticipation effect was found in animals with minimal weight loss, it is interpreted as an incentive-motivation effect.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(13 reference statements)
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings thus replicate those of Staddon and Ayres (1975), but differ from the marked increases in running under periodic feeding shown in the data of Bolles and Moot (1973), Levitsky and Collier (1968), and Melcer and Timberlake (1986). All these studies are generally consistent with Staddon's (1977) conclusion that the amount of schedule-induced running that is engendered by a situation is inversely related to the amount of space available to the rat outside the wheel (cf.…”
Section: Excessivenesssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…These findings thus replicate those of Staddon and Ayres (1975), but differ from the marked increases in running under periodic feeding shown in the data of Bolles and Moot (1973), Levitsky and Collier (1968), and Melcer and Timberlake (1986). All these studies are generally consistent with Staddon's (1977) conclusion that the amount of schedule-induced running that is engendered by a situation is inversely related to the amount of space available to the rat outside the wheel (cf.…”
Section: Excessivenesssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Similarly, it has been found that adult rats maintained on a daily feeding schedule continue to display an increased anticipatory activity for several days after the schedule has been altered (BOLLES & MooT, 1973;ASCHOFF pers. comm.).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Because the control mothers were observed to be away from their young during 34% of the day observations, the Group D females apparently could have met their food intake requirements without greatly altering their pattern of maternal behavior. Their failure to do so indicates that in the rat the daily rhythm of maternal behavior, like the circadian rhythm in activity (Bolles & Moot, 1973;Wright, 1965), is, at least in part, synchronized with respect to the time when food is available to the individual.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the adult rat, limiting the availability of food and water to some portion of the t h e that illumination occurs results in an alteration in the pattern of many behavioral and physiological periodicities (Johnson & Levine, 1973;Krieger, 1974;Lc Magnen, Devos, Gaudillikre, Louis-Sylvestre, & Tallon, 1973;Peret, Macaire, & Chanez, 1973), including the activity rhythm (Bolles & Moot, 1973;Wright, 1965). Thus, a lightdependent restriction on the food and water intake of a lactating rilt may also influence the maternal activity rhythm and, in turn, the milk intake pattern of the young.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%