PsycEXTRA Dataset 1983
DOI: 10.1037/e679002011-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Rasch Model for Item Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The FACETS model is appropriate if the intent of the assessment developers is to sum the accuracy ratings in order to produce an overall accuracy score for each rater. As with other Rasch measurement models, another basic assumption of the FACETS model is that the set of people to be measured (raters in this case) and the set of items (benchmark performances and domains in this case) used to measure them can each be uniquely ordered in terms of their competence (accuracy in this case) and difficulty, respectively (Choppin, 1987). If the data fit the model and this unique ordering is realized, then a variety of desirable measurement characteristics can be attained.…”
Section: A Facets Model For Evaluating Rater Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FACETS model is appropriate if the intent of the assessment developers is to sum the accuracy ratings in order to produce an overall accuracy score for each rater. As with other Rasch measurement models, another basic assumption of the FACETS model is that the set of people to be measured (raters in this case) and the set of items (benchmark performances and domains in this case) used to measure them can each be uniquely ordered in terms of their competence (accuracy in this case) and difficulty, respectively (Choppin, 1987). If the data fit the model and this unique ordering is realized, then a variety of desirable measurement characteristics can be attained.…”
Section: A Facets Model For Evaluating Rater Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Person‐pairs are two persons who, within a relatively short time frame, responded to the same question. Choppin () already mentioned the possibility of comparing person‐pairs, but found little practical application in his days. However, the possibility of detecting differential development of students over time compared to other students in their class or cohort seems like a promising application in the context of student monitoring systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quite some work in educational measurement discusses how psychometric data can be regarded as pairwise comparisons, where a response is generated by a personitem interaction (e.g., Choppin, 1968Choppin, , 1983Guttman, 1946;van der Linden & Eggen, 1988;Zwinderman, 1995). The idea of data filtering as mentioned above is not new in paired comparisons.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second phase was concerned with launching the real survey conducted at the national level. In this step we adopted the Rasch model, proposed by Georg Rasch (1960), which is a model now widely employed for question analysis [17] that can be implemented on the basis of a small sample [18]. It makes an attempt to bridge the gap between the social sciences and the physical sciences.…”
Section: Research Methodology "Think Global Act Local"mentioning
confidence: 99%