1987
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.50.7.840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The rapid assessment of visual dysfunction in multiple sclerosis.

Abstract: SUMMARY A consecutive series of patients with normal activity and a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (10 male and 31 female) underwent extensive ophthalmological examination including visual evoked potentials (VEPs) and a new test of contrast sensitivity, which is described in detail. Seventy three per cent of patients had abnormal contrast sensitivity and 83% had abnormal VEPs. There was no association between abnormalities of the two types, but patients who had impaired contrast sensitivity and normal VEPs we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample size was based on the normal distribution of the VEP P100 mean (SD) latency of 100 (5) milliseconds. 16,[30][31][32] The upper limit of the normal distribution is commonly defined as 2 SDs above the mean, 16,30,32 or 110 milliseconds. The estimated clinically significant difference between the 2 groups was hypothesized to be 1 SD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample size was based on the normal distribution of the VEP P100 mean (SD) latency of 100 (5) milliseconds. 16,[30][31][32] The upper limit of the normal distribution is commonly defined as 2 SDs above the mean, 16,30,32 or 110 milliseconds. The estimated clinically significant difference between the 2 groups was hypothesized to be 1 SD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This idea is also expressed by several authors, who refers to CS evaluation as the most sensitive technique for subclinical visual loss detection, when compared to other visual tests, such as color vision analysis and visual evoked potentials (VEP). [ 8 15 16 ] However, others suggest that this visual test is not useful for the evaluation of these subjects. [ 17 ] This may occur because of a lack of uniformity between evaluation techniques and selection of the spatial frequencies band to be evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of studies evaluates only a single spatial frequency, with 4 cpd being the most frequent one. [ 15 17 18 ] In clinical studies, where several spatial frequencies are evaluated, usually not enough frequencies are assessed for the trace of the complete CS curve. The most common case is the absence of a high-frequency or a low-frequency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abnormal VERs were found in 100 per cent of symptomatic optic nerves by Miller et af. (1988), and in 72 per cent and 83 per cent by Bewermeyer et al (1986) and Della-Sala et al (1987), respectively. However, the demyelinating process in the brain sometimes is not disseminated into areas involving the VERs, so normal VERS cannot exclude MS. VER examination was normal for our case 2, with blurred vision as the initial symptom, but concurrent computerized perimetry was markedly abnormal (see Table I and Fig.…”
Section: The Fema1e:male Ratio In Adults Withmentioning
confidence: 92%