2017
DOI: 10.3103/s0747923917010078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The range of induction-coil magnetic field sensors for geophysical explorations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensor based on magnetoplasmonic crystal as a probe provides high sensitivity at small spot size which makes it sufficient and promising for biomedical applications and allows one to scan the surface area without moving the probe element. Magneto-modulati on 9,13,39,40 Magnetooptical 41,42 Magnons 16…”
Section: Experimental Demonstrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensor based on magnetoplasmonic crystal as a probe provides high sensitivity at small spot size which makes it sufficient and promising for biomedical applications and allows one to scan the surface area without moving the probe element. Magneto-modulati on 9,13,39,40 Magnetooptical 41,42 Magnons 16…”
Section: Experimental Demonstrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us briefly review the latest developments for conventional magnetic field sensors with respect to the magnetic field resolution: There are still improvements in conventional-type induction coil sensors, e.g., Poliakov et al (2017). Besides those, in the past decade, new induction coil sensors were developed, so-called B field coils (Macnae 2012) which allow for the measurement of the magnetic field with a noise floor of ∼ 10fT∕ √ Hz but at the expense of significant low-frequency noise.…”
Section: Appendix 2 Magnetometer Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many magnetic field sensors exist [94], but only induction coil magnetometers and fluxgate magnetic field sensors have maintained their place in the market. SQUID (Super-conducting Quantum Interference Device) were very popular in the 1980s [95] because they can be up to 1 million times more sensitive than coils, but they are very difficult to handle in operations and are at least 10 times more expensive thus do not allows the deployment of several tens or hundreds of these sensors. That leaves them for research purposes until the cost come down and operations get improved.…”
Section: Csem Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%