2015
DOI: 10.1080/01603477.2015.1078734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The random walk versus unbiased efficiency: can we separate the wheat from the chaff?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Speculation is mostly practised in the form of technical trading of so-called chartists on forex markets. All this is fairly well elaborated in exchange-rate research based on behavioural finance and Keynesian theories of expectations (for a critique of IRP, see also Harvey 2004;Moosa 2015;Priewe 2015;2016: 31ff).…”
Section: Criticismsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Speculation is mostly practised in the form of technical trading of so-called chartists on forex markets. All this is fairly well elaborated in exchange-rate research based on behavioural finance and Keynesian theories of expectations (for a critique of IRP, see also Harvey 2004;Moosa 2015;Priewe 2015;2016: 31ff).…”
Section: Criticismsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The dynamic nature of security prices which changes all the time is considered as the main factor affecting the unpredictable pattern. Proponents of the random walk theory argue that, this dynamic nature is as a result of unbiased expectations made by investors and market participants about future expectations (Moosa, 2015). That is to say, stock prices are unbiased estimators of market value because market prices change with almost the same proportion as new information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%