2017 9th International Conference on Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics (IHMSC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/ihmsc.2017.132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Random Forest Based Detection of Shadowsock's Traffic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to verify the validity of the method, we compare it with the classification methods proposed in literature [44] and literature [25]. There are two main reasons we choose these two methods for comparative experiments.…”
Section: ) Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to verify the validity of the method, we compare it with the classification methods proposed in literature [44] and literature [25]. There are two main reasons we choose these two methods for comparative experiments.…”
Section: ) Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the few researches about SS traffic, most of them are the identification of specific websites and web pages on SS traffic based on fingerprint attacks [42], [43]. To the best of our knowledge, only Deng et al proposed a random forest-based SS detection method in 2017 [44]. The method extracts more than 3000 features from bidirectional flows and network packets host profile, and the detection rate reaches 85% or more on the experimental data set.…”
Section: B Encrypted and Anonymous Traffic Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation of the AMPs property and structural descriptors to their activity levels were modeled with the random forest algorithm (Ho, 1995) as implemented in the Weka data mining software (Witten et al, 2016). Random forest was selected as the modeling algorithm for a number of reasons as follows: (a) demonstrated robust prediction performance in wide range of domains ranging from signal processing (Deng et al, 2017) to social sciences (Araque et al, 2017), (b) relative insensitivity to initialization parameters, (c) usage familiarity by our group, (d) capable of computing molecular descriptor importance via the mean decrease of entropy (Breiman, 2001) (more on molecular descriptors is found at the end of this section). For a detailed description of the prediction modeling process, the book (Kuhn & Johnson, 2013) is suggested.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation of the AMPs property and structural descriptors to their activity levels were modeled with the random forest algorithm (Ho, 1995) as implemented in the Weka data mining software (Witten et al, 2016). Random forest was selected as the modeling algorithm for a number of reasons as follows: (a) demonstrated robust prediction performance in wide range of domains ranging from signal processing (Deng et al, 2017) to social sciences (Araque et al, 2017), (b) relative insensitivity to initialization parameters, (c) usage familiarity by our group, (d) capable of computing molecular descriptor importance via the mean decrease of entropy (Breiman, 2001) (more on molecular descriptors is found at the end of this section). For a detailed description of the prediction modeling process, the book (Kuhn and Johnson, 2013) is suggested.…”
Section: Multivariate Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%