2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01404-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The radon concentrations of some waters in Bitlis (Turkey) and their dose estimates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, the 222 Rn gas hardly emanates from the water, so the 222 Rn level was higher than the others. However, all the samples contained lower 222 Rn levels than both the maximum contamination limit (MCL) of 11.1 Bq/L set by USEPA and the safe limit of 100 Bq/L recommended by the WHO [11,[42][43][44].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this reason, the 222 Rn gas hardly emanates from the water, so the 222 Rn level was higher than the others. However, all the samples contained lower 222 Rn levels than both the maximum contamination limit (MCL) of 11.1 Bq/L set by USEPA and the safe limit of 100 Bq/L recommended by the WHO [11,[42][43][44].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, these may be the leading causes of the lower 222 Rn level in the tap water of Dhaka city. Bitlis, Turkey 0.59 to 66.00 [42] Xinjiang, China 0.543 [11] Chiang Mai, Thailand 0.18-1.13 [7] Sabzevaran fault, Iran 17.12 [45] Zarand, Iran 5.16 to 14.4 [47] Kabini River Basin, India 8.5 [48] Sik, Malaysia 0.0171 ± 0.0036 [4] Giresun University, Turkey 0.98 to 27.28 [49] Rajasthan, India 0.5 to 15 [50] Kedah, Malaysia 7.0 ± 0.71 [51] Bihor, Romania 6.9 [52] Nablus, Palestine 1.0 [43] Bursa, Turkey 0.91 to 12.58 [53] Kenya 37 [12] Dhaka, Bangladesh…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%