1984
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(84)80074-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The radioresponsiveness of human tumours and the initial slope ofthe cell survival curve

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

9
124
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 450 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
9
124
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, for some tumours the wrong conclusion could be arrived at if radiosensitivity is predicted using a dose, even a few Gy, above that used in the clinic. This conclusion also concurs with seminal studies of Malaise et al (1987) and Deacon et al (1984), updated by Steel (1996) in which they provide considerable evidence that the radiosensitivity of tumours is most reliably measured at 2 Gy. The clinical studies of West and colleagues would support this proposition (West et al, 1997;Bjork-Eriksson et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clearly, for some tumours the wrong conclusion could be arrived at if radiosensitivity is predicted using a dose, even a few Gy, above that used in the clinic. This conclusion also concurs with seminal studies of Malaise et al (1987) and Deacon et al (1984), updated by Steel (1996) in which they provide considerable evidence that the radiosensitivity of tumours is most reliably measured at 2 Gy. The clinical studies of West and colleagues would support this proposition (West et al, 1997;Bjork-Eriksson et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, a number of factors can influence cell survival following radiation exposure, and the studies of Malaise et al (1987) and Deacon et al (1984) suggest that for a predictive test of radiosensitivity the measurements must be made at doses o6 Gy. Therefore studies of DSBs, although useful in understanding physico-chemical effects of radiation on DNA, have less utility in defining clinically relevant parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on the last parameter the surviving fraction at 2 Gy (SF2) of human tumour cell lines has been shown to correlate with the radioresponsiveness of the tumour types from which they were derived (Deacon et al, 1984;Fertil and Malaise, 1985). The predictive value of parameters of the low-dose region of radiation cell survival curves has also been confirmed by studies on experimental animal tumours (Bristow and Hill, 1990) and in mathematical modelling systems (Tucker and Thames, 1989).…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…tests. However, intrinsic radiosensitivity expressed as parameters of the low-dose region of radiation cell survival curves is thought to be one of the most important and significant factors determining the response of a tumour to radiation treatment (Deacon et al, 1984;Fertil and Malaise, 1985;Tucker and Thames, 1989;Brock et al, 1990Brock et al, , 1992Davidson et al, 1990;West and Hendry 1992;West et al, 1993West et al, , 1997Girinsky et al, 1993Girinsky et al, , 1994.…”
Section: Sf2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intrinsic cellular radiosensitivity is now widely recognized as a significant factor influencing the clinical response of tumours (Fertil and Malaise, 1981; Deacon et al, 1984) and normal tissues (Burnet et al, 1992;Wurm et al, 1995) to ionizing radiation. Certain radiobiological parameters have been implicated as important determinants of the degree of intrinsic radiosensitivity shown by different cells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%