2020
DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2020.1841881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ‘radical critique of interviews’: a response to recent comments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These philosophies influence, implicitly or explicitly, how researchers think of methods, data and the research process. For example, some of the criticisms directed at the interview as a tool to inspect individual experiences and views that we mentioned earlier are informed by certain versions of constructionism [ 37 , 38 ], a set of related philosophical standpoints generally arguing that any apparent reality is the object of selection and construction processes [ 105 ]. Constructionism also questions the notion of generalizability [ 96 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These philosophies influence, implicitly or explicitly, how researchers think of methods, data and the research process. For example, some of the criticisms directed at the interview as a tool to inspect individual experiences and views that we mentioned earlier are informed by certain versions of constructionism [ 37 , 38 ], a set of related philosophical standpoints generally arguing that any apparent reality is the object of selection and construction processes [ 105 ]. Constructionism also questions the notion of generalizability [ 96 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors advert that interviews may be seen as an unproblematic vehicle to individual views and experiences, which neglects their constitutive and performative dimension, thus potentially celebrating cultural features of a society where interviewing is pervasive [28,29,35]. Such criticisms have generated debates about the purposes and value of interviewing and interview data [30,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. Nevertheless, interviews are still frequently used in ways compatible with the understanding described earlier.…”
Section: Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It adopted an ontologically realist approach to food poverty, while recognising the ways in which the study focuses and the interactive context of the interview influenced young people's frames of reference. This is not to say that the social phenomena to which young people's responses referred did not exist independently of their accounts [43].…”
Section: The Study: Research Design Methods and Analytic Strategymentioning
confidence: 96%