2015
DOI: 10.1002/micr.22425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The radial forearm snake flap: A novel approach to oral cavity and oropharyngeal reconstruction that reduces forearm donor site morbidity

Abstract: Radial forearm snake flaps are useful for reconstruction of small to medium size defects of the oral cavity and oropharynx and enable primary donor site closure. Flap success rates are not compromised by raising a radial forearm snake flap and rates of delayed healing of the flap donor site are significantly reduced compared to forearm flap donor sites closed with STSGs. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 37:6-11, 2017.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The harvested tissue can be tubed upon itself before insetting the flap into the neck. 13,14 Forearm free flap offers a thin, pliable, and versatile fasciocutaneous tissue with a long and reliable pedicle 1,3,4,7,9,14,15 (►Figs. 1, 2).…”
Section: Radial Forearm Free Flapmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The harvested tissue can be tubed upon itself before insetting the flap into the neck. 13,14 Forearm free flap offers a thin, pliable, and versatile fasciocutaneous tissue with a long and reliable pedicle 1,3,4,7,9,14,15 (►Figs. 1, 2).…”
Section: Radial Forearm Free Flapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 The main disadvantage of the forearm flaps is the need for split-thickness skin graft covering of the donor site leading to potentially poor functional and aesthetic outcomes. 9,14,15…”
Section: Radial Forearm Free Flapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, many options are available for closing the RFFF donor site without the need for an additional operative site. These included ipsilateral FTSG, hinged radial forearm STSG, ulnar perforator flap, cross‐suturing, artificial skin graft, tissue expander, local hatchet flap, and snake design RFFF flap …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has many advantages as the ideal tissue replacement, such as a long vascular pedicle, constant, reliable anatomy, ease of harvest, thin pliable, supple skin, the possibility of reinnervation, two teams operating, and a high success rate (90%-100%). [2][3][4] Despite these advantages, the donor site defect remains the major disadvantage of the RFFF. Split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) and full-thickness skin grafting (FTSG) are the most common methods used for covering the donor site defect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation