1992
DOI: 10.1016/s1010-5182(05)80394-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The radial forearm free flap: our experience in solving donor site problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To do away with the need for an additional donor site for grafting, primary closure may be considered in small radial defects9. In medium-sized radial defects, Ular flap10, Z-plasty11, or modified Z-plasty of combined Ular flap and Z-plasty12 were introduced. Note, however, that local flap requires wide dissection underneath the local flap.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do away with the need for an additional donor site for grafting, primary closure may be considered in small radial defects9. In medium-sized radial defects, Ular flap10, Z-plasty11, or modified Z-plasty of combined Ular flap and Z-plasty12 were introduced. Note, however, that local flap requires wide dissection underneath the local flap.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7). We feel that a local ulnar forearm flap or a VY flap can be used to reconstruct smaller defects at the donor site, but defects larger than 35 cm 2 need, at least partly, a splitskin graft [15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39,40 Use of split or fullthickness skin grafts to cover the donor site often leads to poor results such as dyschromia and wide scarring. 41,42 Although less frequent, exposures of the tendon of both the flexor carpi radialis and the brachialis muscles have been experienced as a consequence of peritenon loss, such as in cases of median nerve lesions. 40 For these reasons, many techniques have been developed with the aim of reducing donor site morbidity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%