2019
DOI: 10.1080/13613324.2019.1592831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The racial politics of STEM education in the USA: interrogations and explorations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
79
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
79
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, many science instructors hold the assumption that STEM fields are somehow “unbiased” and immune to societal injustices (Saini, 2020; Smith & Scharmann, 1999; Wheeler et al., 2019), making inclusive teaching challenging. Lastly, traditional STEM curricula tend to promote racist, sexist, and Eurocentric ideas (Black Lives Matter in Ecology & Evolution, 2020; Hayssen, 2020; Hayssen & Orr, 2017; Peters, 2015; Smedley & Smedley, 2005; Vakil & Ayers, 2019). Disparities start early, as a recent study found introductory biology textbooks were more likely to highlight men scientists, and none of the books analyzed highlighted a Black woman scientist (Wood et al., 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, many science instructors hold the assumption that STEM fields are somehow “unbiased” and immune to societal injustices (Saini, 2020; Smith & Scharmann, 1999; Wheeler et al., 2019), making inclusive teaching challenging. Lastly, traditional STEM curricula tend to promote racist, sexist, and Eurocentric ideas (Black Lives Matter in Ecology & Evolution, 2020; Hayssen, 2020; Hayssen & Orr, 2017; Peters, 2015; Smedley & Smedley, 2005; Vakil & Ayers, 2019). Disparities start early, as a recent study found introductory biology textbooks were more likely to highlight men scientists, and none of the books analyzed highlighted a Black woman scientist (Wood et al., 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, many science instructors hold the assumption that STEM fields are somehow "unbiased" and immune to societal injustices Scharmann, 1999, Wheeler et al, 2019), making inclusive teaching challenging. Lastly, traditional STEM curricula tend to promote racist, sexist, and Eurocentric ideas (Smedley and Smedley, 2005;Peters, 2015;Hayssen and Orr, 2017;Vakil and Ayers, 2019;Black Lives Matter in Ecology and Evolution, 2020;Hayssen, 2020). Disparities start early, as a recent study found introductory biology textbooks were more likely to highlight men scientists, and none of the books analyzed highlighted a Black woman scientist (Wood et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies in pedagogy and scientific communication challenge such "deficit" (sensu [60]) approaches by examining disciplinary and institutional practices that contribute to lower recruitment and retention of underrepresented students [61,62]. Research training is an important component of STEM education, but there is increasing recognition [5,8,63,64] that awareness of social identities (i.e., cultural competency or humility), can support institutional and disciplinary efforts to diversify STEM participation at all educational levels.…”
Section: Cultural Humility and Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cultural barriers in STEM participation may be challenging to address because of the value of objectivity in these disciplines and research emphases on empirical, objective, and largely non-cultural topics. However, Vakil and Ayers [8] caution that STEM is not independent of socio-political biases-scientific values and knowledge production have frequently omitted the contributions and experiences of those outside the dominant culture. Consequently, cultural and social barriers are exacerbated with low diversity in certain academic disciplines or institutions [7,9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%