2017
DOI: 10.1177/1541204017698213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Racial and Gender Differences in the Impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences on Juvenile Residential Placement

Abstract: Research has demonstrated a relationship between adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and a variety of juvenile offending outcomes. No study to date, however, has examined the relationship between ACEs and juvenile residential placement. The current study utilized a large sample of 4,733 adjudicated juveniles in Florida in order to examine the relationship between ACEs and residential placement across gender and race/ethnicity. For the entire study sample, ACEs significantly increased the odds of residential p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings make the study of ACE exposure among juvenile offenders critical and extremely policy-relevant across multidisciplinary research. In terms of juvenile justice system involvement, those in deeper end placements (such as residential facilities) have higher ACE scores than juvenile offenders with less justice system penetration (Cannon et al, 2016), with each additional exposure type by age 12 increasing the likelihood a juvenile offender would be placed in a residential facility by age 18 by 20% (Zettler et al, 2018).…”
Section: Aces and Aggression/offendingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings make the study of ACE exposure among juvenile offenders critical and extremely policy-relevant across multidisciplinary research. In terms of juvenile justice system involvement, those in deeper end placements (such as residential facilities) have higher ACE scores than juvenile offenders with less justice system penetration (Cannon et al, 2016), with each additional exposure type by age 12 increasing the likelihood a juvenile offender would be placed in a residential facility by age 18 by 20% (Zettler et al, 2018).…”
Section: Aces and Aggression/offendingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Youth with more ACEs were also found to be more likely to reoffend (Wolff & Baglivio, 2017) and to reoffend sooner (Wolff et al, 2017) following completion of a community-based program. Furthermore, ACEs assessed at age 12 were significantly predictive of residential placement by age 18 for Black and Hispanic males, as well as for Black females (Zettler et al, 2018).…”
Section: Juvenile Offending Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examining over 64,000 juvenile offenders, Baglivio & Epps (2014) [demonstrated low risk to reoffend youth was more likely to report 0 ACE exposures than high-risk youth, with 22% of the variance in risk to reoffend category (as per a validated tool) explained by the ACE score. Among 4,733 juvenile offenders, each additional ACE exposure, captured by age 12, increased the likelihood that a youth would be committed to a juvenile justice residential facility by age 18 by 20%, though the ACE-residential placement effect did not hold for White males or females or Hispanic females (Zettler, Wolff, Baglivio, Craig, & Epps, 2018).…”
Section: Deleterious Effects Of Aces’ Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%