The persistence of race, class, gender, and regional inequality in US education poses many challenges for policy-makers and scholars. Investigations of school crises, as presently constructed, tend to treat the problems and paradoxes of inequality as exceptions to the American democratic system, instead of seeing them as contradictions within the system. This research suggests an alternative theoretical framework to study inequality and education reform. It analyzes a century of education crises by combining`the sociological imagination' with a world-system perspective. It focuses on North Carolina in its assessment of Southern education as American education.The topic of education reform in the USA periodically surfaces as a critique of inequality in public institutions, but often fosters individual and private solutions that exacerbate inequality. For example, court-ordered desegregation attempted to close the gap between separate and unequal schools, but prompted the proliferation of white academies and the abandonment of public schools in the 1960s and 1970s. The excellence movement of the 1980s purported to raise public school standards, but led many parents to seek private alternatives to public education, and spurred local and state governments to support vouchers and charter schools that improved choice' for some, but increased inequalities for others. These solutions to education crises in¯amed deeply rooted tensions and con¯icts about race, class, gender, and regional inequality in public education. These measures did not reduce inequality; instead, they abetted efforts to defend, justify, and perpetuate inequality.Scholarly investigations of education crises and reform strategies contribute to the perpetuation and legitimation of inequality, perhaps unintentionally, by framing research around certain taken-for-granted assumptions underlying education, rather than questioning the fundamental assumptions used to construct the education crisis. In the 1980s, for example, discussions of education reform paralleled discussions of economic restructuring and downsizing. Linking the US decline in the global economy to alleged educational shortcomings, scholars and policy-makers